Suppr超能文献

心力衰竭的“有效”治疗未能改善正常日常活动。

Failure of "effective" treatment for heart failure to improve normal customary activity.

作者信息

Walsh J T, Andrews R, Evans A, Cowley A J

机构信息

University Hospital, Nottingham.

出版信息

Br Heart J. 1995 Oct;74(4):373-6. doi: 10.1136/hrt.74.4.373.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effects of drug treatment on laboratory exercise tests in relation to measures of daily activity in patients with chronic heart failure.

SETTING

University teaching hospital.

SUBJECTS

18 patients with mild to moderate chronic heart failure (New York Heart Association functional class II-III) and 10 age matched healthy controls.

METHODS

Assessments were made before and after 12 weeks of vasodilator drug treatment. Exercise capacity was measured during two different types of treadmill exercise, one using a ramp protocol and the other a fixed work load. Corridor walk tests at three self selected speeds were also undertaken and measures of customary activity assessed from pedometer scores.

RESULTS

Exercise times were significantly increased from baseline (P < 0.01) with both treadmill protocols after 12 weeks of drug treatment, with a positive correlation between the duration of treadmill exercise for both protocols (r = 0.69, P < 0.01). Corridor walk tests of 100 m at a self selected slow speed also improved (P < 0.02) but these did not correlate with the changes in treadmill exercise time. The pedometer scores of the patients with heart failure were greatly reduced compared with those of the controls (258 (45) x 10(2) v 619 (67) x 10(2) steps/week, P < 0.001) and after 12 weeks of treatment were unchanged (261 (42) x 10(2) steps/week).

CONCLUSIONS

These data confirm the need to use different exercise protocols when assessing the benefits of drug treatment in patients with chronic heart failure. Treatments that seem effective with conventional laboratory based exercise tests may not improve daily activities. This may reflect a failure of apparently successful treatment and should be considered when interpreting clinical trials.

摘要

目的

探讨药物治疗对慢性心力衰竭患者实验室运动试验的影响,并与日常活动量进行关联分析。

地点

大学教学医院。

研究对象

18例轻至中度慢性心力衰竭患者(纽约心脏协会心功能分级II - III级)以及10名年龄匹配的健康对照者。

方法

在血管扩张剂药物治疗12周前后进行评估。通过两种不同类型的跑步机运动来测量运动能力,一种采用斜坡方案,另一种采用固定工作量方案。还进行了三种自行选择速度的走廊步行试验,并根据计步器得分评估日常活动量。

结果

药物治疗12周后,两种跑步机运动方案的运动时间均较基线显著增加(P < 0.01),两种方案的跑步机运动持续时间之间呈正相关(r = 0.69,P < 0.01)。自行选择的慢速进行100米走廊步行试验也有所改善(P < 0.02),但这些与跑步机运动时间的变化无关。心力衰竭患者的计步器得分与对照组相比大幅降低(258(45)×10²对619(67)×10²步/周,P < 0.001),治疗12周后无变化(261(42)×10²步/周)。

结论

这些数据证实,在评估慢性心力衰竭患者药物治疗的益处时,需要使用不同的运动方案。在传统的基于实验室的运动试验中看似有效的治疗方法,可能无法改善日常活动。这可能反映了表面上成功的治疗存在不足,在解释临床试验时应予以考虑。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Maximal exercise tolerance as a therapeutic end point in heart failure--are we relying on the right measure?
Am J Cardiol. 1994 Feb 1;73(4):304-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(94)90238-0.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验