• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1990 - 1994年牛津地区基金持有型与非基金持有型医疗机构转诊模式趋势的前瞻性研究。

Prospective study of trends in referral patterns in fundholding and non-fundholding practices in the Oxford region, 1990-4.

作者信息

Surender R, Bradlow J, Coulter A, Doll H, Brown S S

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Infirmary.

出版信息

BMJ. 1995 Nov 4;311(7014):1205-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7014.1205.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.311.7014.1205
PMID:7488902
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2551123/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare outpatient referral patterns in fundholding and non-fundholding practices before and after the NHS reforms in April 1991.

DESIGN

Prospective collection of data on general practitioners' referrals to specialist outpatient clinics between June 1990 and January 1994 and detailed comparisons of three phases--October 1990 to March 1991 (phase 1), October 1991 to March 1992 (phase 2), and October 1993 to January 1994 (phase 3).

SETTING

10 first wave fundholding practices and six non-fundholding practices in the Oxford region.

SUBJECTS

Patients referred to consultant out-patient clinics.

RESULTS

NHS referral rates increased in fundholding practices in phase 2 and phase 3 of the study by 8.1/1000 patients a year (95% confidence interval 5.7 to 10.5), an increase of 7.5% from phase 1 (107.3/1000) to phase 3 (115.4/1000). Non-fundholders' rates increased significantly, by 25.3/1000 patients (22.5-28.1), an increase of 26.6% from phase 1 (95.0/1000) to phase 3 (120.3/1000). The fundholders' referral rates to private clinics decreased by 8.8%, whereas those from non-fundholding practices increased by 12.2%. The proportion of referrals going outside district boundaries did not change significantly. Three of the four practices entering the third and fourth wave of fundholding increased their referral rates significantly in the year before becoming fundholders.

CONCLUSIONS

No evidence existed that budgetary pressures caused first wave fundholders to reduce referral rates, although the method of budget allocation may have encouraged general practitioners to inflate their referral rates in the preparatory year. Despite investment in new practice based facilities, no evidence yet exists that fundholding encourages a shift away from specialist care.

摘要

目的

比较1991年4月英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)改革前后,实行基金持有制和非基金持有制的诊所的门诊转诊模式。

设计

前瞻性收集1990年6月至1994年1月期间全科医生转诊至专科门诊的数据,并对三个阶段进行详细比较,即1990年10月至1991年3月(第一阶段)、1991年10月至1992年3月(第二阶段)以及1993年10月至1994年1月(第三阶段)。

地点

牛津地区的10家首批实行基金持有制的诊所和6家非基金持有制的诊所。

研究对象

转诊至顾问门诊的患者。

结果

在研究的第二阶段和第三阶段,实行基金持有制的诊所的NHS转诊率每年每1000名患者增加8.1例(95%置信区间为5.7至10.5),从第一阶段(107.3/1000)到第三阶段(115.4/1000)增加了7.5%。非基金持有制诊所的转诊率显著增加,每1000名患者增加25.3例(22.5 - 28.1),从第一阶段(95.0/1000)到第三阶段(120.3/1000)增加了26.6%。基金持有制诊所转诊至私立诊所的比率下降了8.8%,而非基金持有制诊所的这一比率增加了12.2%。转诊至地区边界以外的比例没有显著变化。进入第三和第四批基金持有制的四家诊所中,有三家在成为基金持有制诊所的前一年转诊率显著增加。

结论

没有证据表明预算压力导致首批实行基金持有制的诊所降低转诊率,尽管预算分配方法可能在筹备年度鼓励了全科医生提高转诊率。尽管对基于诊所的新设施进行了投资,但尚无证据表明基金持有制会促使患者减少寻求专科护理。

相似文献

1
Prospective study of trends in referral patterns in fundholding and non-fundholding practices in the Oxford region, 1990-4.1990 - 1994年牛津地区基金持有型与非基金持有型医疗机构转诊模式趋势的前瞻性研究。
BMJ. 1995 Nov 4;311(7014):1205-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7014.1205.
2
Effect of NHS reforms on general practitioners' referral patterns.英国国民医疗服务体系改革对全科医生转诊模式的影响。
BMJ. 1993 Feb 13;306(6875):433-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6875.433.
3
Effect of fundholding and indicative prescribing schemes on general practitioners' prescribing costs.基金持有和指导性处方计划对全科医生处方成本的影响。
BMJ. 1993 Nov 6;307(6913):1186-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6913.1186.
4
Specialist outreach clinics in Sheffield: a faster tier of out-patient provision for the patients of fundholding GPs?谢菲尔德的专科门诊服务:为实行基金持有制的全科医生的患者提供更快的门诊服务层级?
J Public Health Med. 1997 Sep;19(3):347-53. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024642.
5
The extent of the two tier service for fundholders.针对基金持有人的两级服务范围。
BMJ. 1996 Jun 1;312(7043):1399-401. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7043.1399a.
6
Fundholders' prescribing costs: the first five years.基金持有人的处方成本:头五年
BMJ. 1996 Dec 14;313(7071):1531-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7071.1531.
7
The effects of fundholding in general practice on prescribing habits three years after introduction of the scheme.该计划实施三年后,全科医疗中的基金持有制对处方习惯的影响。
BMJ. 1995 Dec 9;311(7019):1543-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7019.1543.
8
Fundholding in the south Thames Region.泰晤士河南部地区的基金持有情况。
Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Sep;47(422):553-6.
9
Private provision of 'outreach' clinics to fundholding general practices in England.向英国的基金持有型全科诊所提供“外展”诊所的私人服务。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 1998 Jan;3(1):20-2. doi: 10.1177/135581969800300106.
10
Fundholders' referral patterns and perceptions of service quality in hospital provision of elective general surgery.基金持有人在医院提供择期普通外科手术方面的转诊模式及对服务质量的看法。
Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Dec;44(389):557-60.

引用本文的文献

1
Space, place and (waiting) time: reflections on health policy and politics.空间、地点与(等待的)时间:关于卫生政策与政治的思考
Health Econ Policy Law. 2018 Jul;13(3-4):226-250. doi: 10.1017/S1744133117000366. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
2
Pharmaceutical policies: effects of financial incentives for prescribers.药品政策:针对开处方者的经济激励措施的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 4;2015(8):CD006731. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006731.pub2.
3
Explaining variation in referral from primary to secondary care: cohort study.解释从初级保健到二级保健的转诊差异:队列研究。
BMJ. 2010 Nov 30;341:c6267. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c6267.
4
[Organisational reforms in the relationships between general doctors and specialists: impact on referrals].全科医生与专科医生关系中的组织改革:对转诊的影响
Aten Primaria. 2010 Jan;42(1):52-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2009.02.007. Epub 2009 May 15.
5
Interventions to improve outpatient referrals from primary care to secondary care.改善从初级保健向二级保健门诊转诊的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8;2008(4):CD005471. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005471.pub2.
6
Dutch general practitioners' referral of children to specialists: a comparison between 1987 and 2001.荷兰全科医生对儿童的专科转诊:1987年与2001年的比较。
Br J Gen Pract. 2004 Nov;54(508):848-52.
7
A systematic review of the effect of primary care-based service innovations on quality and patterns of referral to specialist secondary care.基于初级保健的服务创新对专科二级保健的质量和转诊模式影响的系统评价。
Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Nov;53(496):878-84.
8
Primary care in the United States: primary care gatekeeping and referrals: effective filter or failed experiment?美国的初级保健:初级保健守门与转诊:有效过滤器还是失败的试验?
BMJ. 2003 Mar 29;326(7391):692-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7391.692.
9
The abolition of the GP fundholding scheme: a lesson in evidence-based policy making.全科医生基金持有计划的废除:循证决策的一个教训。
Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Feb;52(475):141-4.
10
[Comparison of primary care teams in Barcelona according to management formulas].[巴塞罗那初级保健团队基于管理模式的比较]
Aten Primaria. 2000 Nov 30;26(9):600-6. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(00)78731-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of NHS reforms on general practitioners' referral patterns.英国国民医疗服务体系改革对全科医生转诊模式的影响。
BMJ. 1993 Feb 13;306(6875):433-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6875.433.
2
Attempt at deriving a formula for setting general practitioner fundholding budgets.尝试推导制定全科医生基金持有预算的公式。
BMJ. 1994 Oct 22;309(6961):1059-64. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6961.1059.