终于在复苏干预措施上达成了共识。
Consensus finally achieved on resuscitative interventions.
作者信息
Williams J R
出版信息
CMAJ. 1995 Dec 1;153(11):1641-2.
Abstract
A joint policy statement on the resuscitation of patients is published in this issue of CMAJ. Dr. John Williams, the CMA's director of ethics and legal affairs, discusses how it differs from the joint statement published last year.
摘要
本期《加拿大医学协会杂志》发表了一份关于患者复苏的联合政策声明。加拿大医学协会伦理与法律事务主任约翰·威廉姆斯博士讨论了该声明与去年发表的联合声明有何不同。
相似文献
1
Consensus finally achieved on resuscitative interventions.终于在复苏干预措施上达成了共识。
CMAJ. 1995 Dec 1;153(11):1641-2.
2
Joint statement on resuscitative interventions (update 1995). CMA policy summary.关于复苏干预措施的联合声明（1995年更新）。加拿大医学协会政策摘要。
CMAJ. 1995 Dec 1;153(11):1652A-1652F.
3
Letter to an ethicist: resuscitative interventions.致伦理学家的信：复苏干预措施
CMAJ. 1996 Mar 15;154(6):887-8.
4
2005 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. Part 7: Neonatal resuscitation.《2005年心肺复苏及心血管急救科学与治疗建议国际共识》。第7部分：新生儿复苏。
Resuscitation. 2005 Nov-Dec;67(2-3):293-303. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.09.014.
5
2010 International Resuscitation Guidelines – time for a change?
Int Emerg Nurs. 2011 Jan;19(1):3-4. doi: 10.1016/S1755-599X(10)00097-2.
6
The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) consensus on science with treatment recommendations for pediatric and neonatal patients: pediatric basic and advanced life support.国际复苏联合委员会（ILCOR）关于儿科和新生儿患者的科学共识及治疗建议：儿科基础与高级生命支持
Pediatrics. 2006 May;117(5):e955-77. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0206. Epub 2006 Apr 17.
7
Delivery room resuscitation past, present, and the future.产房复苏的过去、现在与未来。
Clin Perinatol. 2006 Mar;33(1):1-9, v. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2005.11.004.
8
Executive summary: the 2005 AEM Consensus Conference on Ethical Conduct of Resuscitation Research.执行摘要：2005年美国急诊医学学会复苏研究伦理行为共识会议
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;12(11):1017-8. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.016.
9
Recipes.食谱。
Can J Cardiol. 2003 Jun;19(7):763-4.
10
An overview of the new resuscitation guidelines.新复苏指南概述。
Nurs Times. 2006;102(3):25-7.
引用本文的文献
1
Canadian Medical Association's ethics activities.
HEC Forum. 2004 Jun;16(2):138-51. doi: 10.1023/b:hecf.0000037124.80498.d4.
本文引用的文献
1
Prognosis-based futility guidelines: does anyone win? SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.基于预后的无效治疗指南：有人从中获益吗？SUPPORT研究组。了解治疗结果与风险的预后及偏好研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994 Nov;42(11):1202-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb06990.x.
2
How is the new statement on resuscitative interventions different from the original?关于复苏干预的新声明与原声明有何不同？
CMAJ. 1994 Oct 15;151(8):1182-3.
3
The SUPPORT prognostic model. Objective estimates of survival for seriously ill hospitalized adults. Study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments.支持性预后模型。对重症住院成人的生存情况进行客观评估。旨在了解预后以及对治疗结果和风险的偏好的研究。
Ann Intern Med. 1995 Feb 1;122(3):191-203. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-122-3-199502010-00007.
4
Pulling the plug on futility.停止无意义的治疗。
BMJ. 1995 Mar 18;310(6981):683-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6981.683.
Zotero 插件