Quiroga J A, van Binsbergen J, Wang C Y, Pardo M, Navas S, Trines C, Herrero M, Carreño V
Hepatology Unit, Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain.
Hepatology. 1995 Dec;22(6):1635-40.
Immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibody to hepatitis C core antigen (anti-HCV-core) was tested by enzyme immunoassay against a synthetic peptide representing amino acids 1 to 62 of the core protein. Of 214 patients with different categories of histological activity, 193 (90%) showed positive results for IgM anti-HCV-core, and 207 (97%) had HCV RNA; most cases (186, 87%) had both markers detectable simultaneously. No differences in the frequency of IgM anti-HCV-core were observed with respect to epidemiological, biochemical, or histological parameters. In 175 interferon alfa (IFN-alpha) recipients, and in 39 untreated controls, pretreatment IgM anti-HCV-core frequencies were similar: 28 of 32 (88%) in sustained responders; 55 of 61 (90%) in responders with relapse; 72 of 82 (88%) in nonresponders; and 38 of 39 (97%) in untreated controls. After IFN-alpha therapy, IgM anti-HCV-core levels became undetectable with significantly greater frequency in sustained responders (P = .014); a similar trend was observed for HCV RNA (P < .0001). IgM anti-HCV-core levels decreased after therapy in responders (P < .001) but increased in nonresponders. Fifty-one cases were longitudinally tested in relation to long-term disease outcome. Both markers remained detectable in most nonresponders with persistent liver disease, in most responders before relapse, and in all but one case at the time of biochemical relapse. IgM anti-HCV-core and HCV RNA became undetectable in most sustained responders, but reappeared despite a long-lasting transaminase normalization, behaving as asymptomatic HCV carriers; the possibility that disease reactivation may take place years afterwards cannot be excluded.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
采用酶免疫分析法检测针对核心蛋白第1至62位氨基酸的合成肽的丙型肝炎核心抗原免疫球蛋白M(IgM)抗体(抗-HCV核心)。在214例具有不同组织学活性类别的患者中,193例(90%)抗-HCV核心IgM检测呈阳性,207例(97%)检测到丙型肝炎病毒RNA(HCV RNA);大多数病例(186例,87%)两种标志物均可同时检测到。在流行病学、生化或组织学参数方面,未观察到抗-HCV核心IgM频率的差异。在175例接受α干扰素(IFN-α)治疗的患者以及39例未治疗的对照中,治疗前抗-HCV核心IgM频率相似:持续应答者中32例有28例(88%);复发应答者中61例有55例(90%);无应答者中82例有72例(88%);未治疗对照中39例有38例(97%)。IFN-α治疗后,持续应答者中抗-HCV核心IgM水平不可检测的频率显著更高(P = 0.014);HCV RNA也观察到类似趋势(P < 0.0001)。治疗后,应答者的抗-HCV核心IgM水平下降(P < 0.001),但无应答者则升高。对51例患者进行了与长期疾病转归相关的纵向检测。在大多数患有持续性肝病的无应答者、大多数复发前的应答者以及除1例之外的所有生化复发时患者中,两种标志物均仍可检测到。在大多数持续应答者中,抗-HCV核心IgM和HCV RNA变得不可检测,但尽管转氨酶长期正常仍再次出现,表现为无症状HCV携带者;不能排除数年后疾病再激活的可能性。(摘要截短于250字)