• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

In vivo evaluation of three acid-stable azalide compounds, L-701,677, L-708,299 and L-708,365 compared to erythromycin, azithromycin and clarithromycin.

作者信息

Gill C J, Abruzzo G K, Flattery A M, Smith J G, Jackson J, Kong L, Wilkening R, Shankaran K, Kropp H, Bartizal K

机构信息

Merck Research Laboratories, Merck & Company, Inc., Rahway, NJ 07065-0900, USA.

出版信息

J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1995 Oct;48(10):1141-7. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.48.1141.

DOI:10.7164/antibiotics.48.1141
PMID:7490222
Abstract

L-701,677, L-708,299 and L-708,365 are novel azalide derivatives of erythromycin that exhibit improved acid stability over erythromycin, azithromycin and clarithromycin. The half-life in aqueous solution at pH = 2.1 of these compounds ranged from 0.3 hour for erythromycin to 16.2 hours for L-708,299. The rank order of half-life in acid solution from most to least stable was L-708,299 > L-701,677 > L-708,365 > azithromycin = clarithromycin > erythromycin. In a disseminated Streptococcus pyogenes mouse infection model, azithromycin and L-708,365 were slightly more efficacious than clarithromycin, L-701,677 and L-708,299; all 5 compounds being more active than erythromycin. In a Klebsiella pneumoniae pulmonary challenge mouse model, azithromycin, L-701,677, L-708,299 and L-708,365 were all equal in efficacy and at least four-fold more active than clarithromycin and erythromycin. Clarithromycin, L-708,365 and interestingly erythromycin, showed greater bacterial clearance than azithromycin, L-701,677 and L-708,299 in a localized infection model that measured clearance of Staphylococcus aureus from mouse thigh tissues. Our results indicate that L-701,677, L-708,299 and L-708,365 exhibit improved acid stability and were at least equally efficacious as presently marketed macrolide/azalide antibiotics.

摘要

相似文献

1
In vivo evaluation of three acid-stable azalide compounds, L-701,677, L-708,299 and L-708,365 compared to erythromycin, azithromycin and clarithromycin.
J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1995 Oct;48(10):1141-7. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.48.1141.
2
Microbiologic activity of the newer macrolide antibiotics.新型大环内酯类抗生素的微生物活性。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1997 Apr;16(4):432-7. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199704000-00026.
3
History of macrolide use in pediatrics.儿科中使用大环内酯类药物的历史。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1997 Apr;16(4):427-31. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199704000-00025.
4
Erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin: are the differences real?红霉素、克拉霉素和阿奇霉素:差异真的存在吗?
Clin Ther. 1996 Jan-Feb;18(1):56-72; discussion 55. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(96)80179-2.
5
Pharmacokinetic and in vivo studies with azithromycin (CP-62,993), a new macrolide with an extended half-life and excellent tissue distribution.对阿奇霉素(CP-62,993)进行的药代动力学和体内研究,阿奇霉素是一种具有延长半衰期和优异组织分布的新型大环内酯类药物。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987 Dec;31(12):1948-54. doi: 10.1128/AAC.31.12.1948.
6
The newer macrolides: azithromycin and clarithromycin.新型大环内酯类药物:阿奇霉素和克拉霉素。
Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2000 Jun;14(2):449-62, x. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5520(05)70257-9.
7
Azithromycin and clarithromycin: overview and comparison with erythromycin.阿奇霉素和克拉霉素:概述及与红霉素的比较
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1992 Jun;13(6):357-68. doi: 10.1086/646545.
8
Azithromycin and clarithromycin.阿奇霉素和克拉霉素。
Pediatr Ann. 1993 Mar;22(3):160, 162-4, 166. doi: 10.3928/0090-4481-19930301-06.
9
Dental therapeutic indications for the newer long-acting macrolide antibiotics.新型长效大环内酯类抗生素的牙科治疗适应证。
J Am Dent Assoc. 1999 Sep;130(9):1341-3. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1999.0404.
10
Comparative tolerability of erythromycin and newer macrolide antibacterials in paediatric patients.红霉素与新型大环内酯类抗菌药物在儿科患者中的耐受性比较
Drug Saf. 1999 Jan;20(1):25-41. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199920010-00004.