Hendershot E F
Medical College of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1995 Sep;9(3):715-30.
Since the introduction of the floroquinolones for clinical use in the late 1980s, they have been used successfully for a large number of clinical situations. As experience accumulates, the indications and optimal use of these agents gradually become more clear. Unfortunately, two of the pathogens for which these agents were most promising--methicillin-resistant S. aureus and P. aeruginosa--have developed resistance. Currently, the quinolones are excellent agents for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections, including those caused by P. aeruginosa. In addition, they should be considered as initial therapy for the treatment of severe bacterial gastroenteritis. The quinolones should also be considered when attempting to eradicate the chronic stool carriage of S. typhi. These agents also offer significant advantages in the treatment of osteomyelitis and prostatitis caused by gram-negative bacilli that frequently require prolonged antimicrobial therapy. Treatment of STDs, especially gonorrhea, is another clear indication for their use. Ciprofloxacin should be considered as initial therapy in patients with malignant otitis externa and in cystic fibrosis patients with exacerbations secondary to P. aeruginosa in the sputum. The role of the quinolones for soft tissue and respiratory tract infections is less clear and their use probably should be limited to certain situations in which there is a clear advantage over beta-lactams, macrolides, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. The new quinolones, fleroxacin, perfloxacin, sparfloxacin, and tosufloxacin, which are being developed and tested for clinical use, will offer advantages in once-a-day dosing and better gram-positive antimicrobial activity. Because the inappropriate or heavy use of the fluoroquinoles has resulted in considerable development of resistance, it is imperative that they be used only when there is a distinct advantage over conventional therapy in terms of efficacy, safety, or cost. Otherwise, the rapid development of resistance will jeopardize the potentially bright future for this entire class of compounds.
自20世纪80年代末氟喹诺酮类药物引入临床应用以来,它们已成功用于大量临床情况。随着经验的积累,这些药物的适应证和最佳用法逐渐变得更加明确。不幸的是,这些药物最具前景的两种病原体——耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌——已产生耐药性。目前,喹诺酮类药物是治疗复杂性尿路感染(包括由铜绿假单胞菌引起的感染)的优秀药物。此外,它们应被视为治疗严重细菌性胃肠炎的初始治疗药物。在试图根除伤寒杆菌的慢性粪便携带时也应考虑使用喹诺酮类药物。这些药物在治疗由革兰氏阴性杆菌引起的骨髓炎和前列腺炎方面也具有显著优势,而这些疾病通常需要长期抗菌治疗。治疗性传播疾病,尤其是淋病,是其使用的另一个明确适应证。环丙沙星应被视为恶性外耳道炎患者以及痰液中铜绿假单胞菌感染加重的囊性纤维化患者的初始治疗药物。喹诺酮类药物在软组织和呼吸道感染中的作用尚不太明确,其使用可能应限于某些比β-内酰胺类、大环内酯类和甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑具有明显优势的情况。正在研发和进行临床测试的新型喹诺酮类药物,如氟罗沙星、培氟沙星、司帕沙星和妥舒沙星,将在每日一次给药和更好的革兰氏阳性抗菌活性方面具有优势。由于氟喹诺酮类药物的不恰当或大量使用已导致耐药性的大量产生,因此必须仅在疗效、安全性或成本方面比传统疗法具有明显优势时才使用它们。否则,耐药性的快速发展将危及这整个类别的化合物可能拥有的光明未来。