Louie T J
Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Calgary, Alta.
CMAJ. 1994 Mar 1;150(5):669-76.
To optimize the use of ciprofloxacin, a synthetic fluoroquinolone, in community and hospital practice, and to minimize overprescribing by providing an overview of the literature and recommendations for appropriate use.
First-line treatment for infections in which ciprofloxacin is shown to be effective, treatment with oral ciprofloxacin rather than parenteral therapy with another drug, and step-down therapy with oral ciprofloxacin after initial parenteral treatment.
In order of importance: efficacy, side effects and cost.
A MEDLINE search of articles concerning ciprofloxacin, including in-vitro and pharmacokinetic studies using recognized standard methods with appropriate controls and published in recognized peer-reviewed journals, and randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trials.
The Committee on Antimicrobial Agents of the Canadian Infectious Disease Society (CIDS) and a recognized expert (T.J.L.) recommended use of ciprofloxacin to treat infections against which it has proved effective both in vitro and in randomized controlled trials. They took into account its value as an oral replacement for other drugs given parenterally and development of resistance.
BENEFITS, HARMS AND COSTS: With more appropriate use of ciprofloxacin there will be less development of resistant pathogens. For certain infections patients who would otherwise require admission to hospital could be treated at home and patients initially admitted for parenteral therapy could be discharged sooner on oral therapy with ciprofloxacin.
Ciprofloxacin may be considered as first-line treatment for a number of infections in which gram-negative pathogens are proven or strongly suspected, including complicated urinary tract infections, bacterial prostatitis, bacterial diarrhea, selected bone and joint infections, malignant otitis externa, bronchopulmonary infections in patients with cystic fibrosis and selected pneumonia cases.
The paper was prepared, reviewed and revised by the Committee on Antimicrobial Agents of the CIDS. It was then reviewed and revised further by the Council of the CIDS.
The CIDS is solely responsible for developing, funding and endorsing these guidelines.
优化合成氟喹诺酮类药物环丙沙星在社区和医院的使用,并通过综述文献及提供合理用药建议,尽量减少过度处方。
环丙沙星显示有效的感染的一线治疗、口服环丙沙星而非用另一种药物进行胃肠外治疗,以及初始胃肠外治疗后采用口服环丙沙星的降阶梯治疗。
按重要性排序:疗效、副作用和成本。
对关于环丙沙星的文章进行医学文献数据库(MEDLINE)检索,包括采用公认标准方法并设有适当对照、发表于公认同行评审期刊的体外和药代动力学研究,以及随机、对照、双盲临床试验。
加拿大传染病协会(CIDS)抗菌药物委员会及一位知名专家(T.J.L.)建议使用环丙沙星治疗在体外试验和随机对照试验中已证明有效的感染。他们考虑到其作为其他胃肠外给药药物的口服替代药物的价值以及耐药性的产生。
益处、危害和成本:更合理地使用环丙沙星将减少耐药病原体的产生。对于某些感染,原本需要住院治疗的患者可在家中接受治疗,最初因胃肠外治疗入院的患者采用环丙沙星口服治疗后可更早出院。
对于多种已证实或高度怀疑革兰氏阴性病原体感染,环丙沙星可被视为一线治疗药物,包括复杂性尿路感染、细菌性前列腺炎、细菌性腹泻、某些骨和关节感染、恶性外耳道炎、囊性纤维化患者的支气管肺部感染以及某些肺炎病例。
本文由CIDS抗菌药物委员会编写、审核和修订。随后由CIDS理事会进一步审核和修订。
CIDS独自负责制定、资助和认可这些指南。