Suppr超能文献

良性前列腺增生症前列腺切除术后影响生活质量变化的因素:手术技术的影响

Factors affecting change in quality of life after prostatectomy for benign prostatic hypertrophy: the impact of surgical techniques.

作者信息

Mozes B, Cohen Y C, Olmer L, Shabtai E

机构信息

Gertner Institute for Health Services Research, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

J Urol. 1996 Jan;155(1):191-6.

PMID:7490831
Abstract

PURPOSE

The impact of prostatectomy on quality of life was assessed in patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) who were classified according to the expected benefit from surgical intervention. The relative impact of the 2 surgical techniques (open versus closed) on short-term quality of life was compared.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An observational study was done on 545 consecutive patients with BPH undergoing prostatectomy at 3 medical centers in Israel between 1991 and 1992. Repeated structured interviews preoperatively, and at 4 and 12 months postoperatively were performed, including 6 quality of life questionnaires evaluating BPH specific (symptom severity and symptom effect) and generic (activity, independence, mental health and health perception) parameters. In addition, the interviews consisted of socio-demographic data elements. Clinical details regarding severity of prostatic disease and co-morbidity were obtained from the medical charts.

RESULTS

We found a correlation between postoperative change in symptom effect and in generic quality of life measures (r-0.11 to 0.20, p < 0.04). The postoperative decrease in the mean symptom effect score was 56% and 52% for severe and moderate preoperative levels, respectively. There was no decrease in the mean symptom effect score for the mild preoperative level (18% of these patients had postoperative deterioration). A secondary operation, and the combination of diabetes mellitus and poor activity level were risk factors for lack of improvement in patients with moderate preoperative symptom effects. We found that the impact of open prostatectomy on quality of life was similar to that of the closed technique after adjustment for patient attributes, except for those with an indwelling urinary catheter in whom an open operation was advantageous.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with BPH and mild symptom effects, and in subgroups of patients with moderate symptom effects surgery should not be recommended. Based on short-term measures of quality of life there is no justification for a preference between open and closed operations.

摘要

目的

在根据手术干预预期获益进行分类的良性前列腺增生(BPH)患者中,评估前列腺切除术对生活质量的影响。比较两种手术技术(开放手术与闭合手术)对短期生活质量的相对影响。

材料与方法

1991年至1992年期间,在以色列的3个医疗中心对545例连续接受前列腺切除术的BPH患者进行了一项观察性研究。术前、术后4个月和12个月进行了重复的结构化访谈,包括6份生活质量问卷,评估BPH特异性(症状严重程度和症状影响)和一般性(活动、独立性、心理健康和健康认知)参数。此外,访谈还包括社会人口统计学数据元素。从病历中获取有关前列腺疾病严重程度和合并症的临床细节。

结果

我们发现症状影响的术后变化与一般性生活质量测量之间存在相关性(r为0.11至0.20,p<0.04)。术前严重和中度水平的患者,术后平均症状影响评分分别下降了56%和52%。术前轻度水平的患者平均症状影响评分没有下降(这些患者中有18%术后病情恶化)。二次手术以及糖尿病与活动水平差的组合是术前症状影响为中度的患者改善不佳的危险因素。我们发现,在对患者属性进行调整后,开放前列腺切除术对生活质量的影响与闭合技术相似,但对于留置导尿管的患者,开放手术更具优势。

结论

对于症状影响较轻的BPH患者以及症状影响为中度的患者亚组,不应推荐手术。基于生活质量的短期测量,没有理由偏好开放手术或闭合手术。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验