Goodall C J
Nurse Educ Today. 1995 Oct;15(5):323-7. doi: 10.1016/s0260-6917(95)80003-4.
Perceptions of and assumptions about disability as diagnosis-based, individualistic, and necessarily tragic, still appear in the nursing literature as well as the general media. The rejection of a medical model of disability by writers who are themselves disabled, and the construction of an alternative social model, might appear to leave nurses--as professional interventionists--without any role in the care and support of physically disabled people. Such a view, as expressed by non-nurse writers, fails to acknowledge the fundamental changes that have occurred in both nursing and nurse education. This article criticizes the presently politically correct social model of disability, and describes an alternative 'interface model', which centres on the actual daily experience of disabled people. This model suggests that there is still a positive and welcome role, as informed partner, for the nurse and his or her disabled client.
将残疾视为基于诊断、个人主义且必然悲惨的观念和假设,在护理文献以及大众媒体中仍然存在。残疾作家对医学残疾模式的摒弃以及另一种社会模式的构建,可能会让作为专业干预者的护士在身体残疾者的护理和支持中显得毫无作用。非护士作家所表达的这种观点,未能认识到护理和护理教育中已经发生的根本变化。本文批评了当前政治上正确的残疾社会模式,并描述了一种替代性的“界面模式”,该模式以残疾人的实际日常经历为核心。这种模式表明,护士作为明智的伙伴,对于其残疾客户而言,仍可发挥积极且受欢迎的作用。