Suppr超能文献

分娩后硬膜外麻醉与腰痛:一项前瞻性队列研究。

Epidural anaesthesia and low back pain after delivery: a prospective cohort study.

作者信息

Macarthur A, Macarthur C, Weeks S

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ. 1995 Nov 18;311(7016):1336-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7016.1336.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether epidural anaesthesia during labour and delivery is a risk factor for postpartum back pain.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study with follow up at one day, seven days, and six weeks after delivery.

SETTING

Teaching hospital in Montreal.

SUBJECTS

329 women who delivered a live infant(s) during the study period. Exclusion criteria were back pain before pregnancy and delivery by elective caesarean section.

INTERVENTION

Epidural anaesthesia during labour and delivery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS

The primary outcome variable was development of postpartum low back pain. Back pain was quantified with self reports (yes/no), a pain score (numeric rating scale), and degree of interference with daily activities. Of the 329 women, 164 received epidural anaesthesia during labour and 165 did not. The incidence of low back pain in epidural v non-epidural group was 53% v 43% on day one; 21% on day seven; and 14% v 7% at six weeks. The relative risk for low back pain (epidural v non-epidural) adjusted for parity, delivery, ethnicity, and weight was 1.76 (95% confidence interval 1.06 to 2.92) on day one; 1.00 (0.54 to 1.86) on day seven; and 2.22 (0.89 to 5.53) at six weeks. There were no differences between the two groups in pain scores or the frequency of interference with daily activities. Similar results were obtained in the subgroup of women with low back pain of new onset--that is, those women with no back pain during their pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Postpartum low back pain was common but decreased considerably over the short term. The association between epidural anaesthesia and postpartum low back pain was inconsistent over time with a significantly increased risk of low back pain (epidural v non-epidural) noted only on the first day after delivery.

摘要

目的

确定分娩期间硬膜外麻醉是否为产后背痛的危险因素。

设计

前瞻性队列研究,在分娩后1天、7天和6周进行随访。

地点

蒙特利尔的教学医院。

研究对象

在研究期间分娩活婴的329名女性。排除标准为妊娠前背痛和择期剖宫产分娩。

干预措施

分娩期间硬膜外麻醉。

主要观察指标及结果

主要观察变量为产后下背痛的发生情况。通过自我报告(是/否)、疼痛评分(数字评分量表)以及对日常活动的干扰程度对背痛进行量化。329名女性中,164名在分娩期间接受了硬膜外麻醉,165名未接受。硬膜外组与非硬膜外组第1天下背痛发生率分别为53%和43%;第7天为21%;6周时为14%和7%。经产次、分娩方式、种族和体重校正后,第1天背痛的相对风险(硬膜外组与非硬膜外组)为1.76(95%置信区间1.06至2.92);第7天为1.00(0.54至1.86);6周时为2.22(0.89至5.53)。两组在疼痛评分或日常活动干扰频率方面无差异。在新发下背痛的女性亚组中也得到了类似结果,即那些孕期无背痛的女性。

结论

产后下背痛很常见,但在短期内显著减轻。硬膜外麻醉与产后下背痛之间的关联随时间不一致,仅在分娩后第一天发现硬膜外麻醉组背痛风险显著增加(硬膜外组与非硬膜外组相比)。

相似文献

4
Back pain following epidural anaesthesia in labour.分娩时硬膜外麻醉后背痛
Can J Anaesth. 1998 Aug;45(8):724-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03012141.
5
Epidural anaesthesia and low back pain after delivery.分娩后硬膜外麻醉与腰痛
BMJ. 1996 Mar 2;312(7030):581. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7030.581.
6
Accuracy of recall of back pain after delivery.产后背痛回忆的准确性。
BMJ. 1996 Aug 24;313(7055):467. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7055.467.
7
Factors associated with back pain after childbirth.产后背痛的相关因素。
Anesthesiology. 1994 Jul;81(1):29-34. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199407000-00006.

引用本文的文献

6
Accuracy of recall of back pain after delivery.产后背痛回忆的准确性。
BMJ. 1996 Aug 24;313(7055):467. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7055.467.
8
Epidural anaesthesia and low back pain after delivery.分娩后硬膜外麻醉与腰痛
BMJ. 1996 Mar 2;312(7030):581. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7030.581.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验