• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Drainage following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy: dogma or need?

作者信息

Lopes A D, Hall J R, Monaghan J M

机构信息

Departments of Gynaecological Oncology and Radiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead, England.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Dec;86(6):960-3. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00311-e.

DOI:10.1016/0029-7844(95)00311-e
PMID:7501348
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the incidence of lymphocyst formation and postoperative morbidity in patients drained or not drained following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection for cervical or endometrial malignancy.

METHODS

A prospective study was undertaken of consecutive patients undergoing radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy at the Regional Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Gateshead, United Kingdom, between February 1992 and September 1994. A Piver type II procedure was performed with nonclosure of the vaginal cuff and pelvic peritoneum. Patients were randomized at the end of surgery to have either two suction drains inserted along the pelvic sidewalls or to have no drains inserted. The detection of lymphocysts was made by clinical examination and abdominal ultrasound scan performed 8 weeks postoperatively.

RESULTS

Eight patients were excluded from the study when drains were deemed necessary to assess postoperative blood loss. Fifty-one were randomized to drains, and 49 to no drains. The detection of lymphocysts by ultrasound and clinical examination in the drained group (15.6 and 5.9%, respectively) was not significantly different from the group not drained (17.4 and 6.1%, respectively). There was no difference in postoperative morbidity in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

There appears to be no advantage to the routine use of pelvic suction drainage following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.

摘要

相似文献

1
Drainage following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy: dogma or need?
Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Dec;86(6):960-3. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00311-e.
2
Randomised trial of drains versus no drains following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: a European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Gynaecological Cancer Group (EORTC-GCG) study in 234 patients.根治性子宫切除术和盆腔淋巴结清扫术后引流与不引流的随机试验:欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织-妇科癌症小组(EORTC-GCG)对234例患者的研究
Eur J Cancer. 2007 May;43(8):1265-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.03.011. Epub 2007 Apr 26.
3
Nonclosure of peritoneum at radical abdominal hysterectomy and pelvic node dissection: a randomized study.根治性腹式子宫切除术及盆腔淋巴结清扫术中不缝合腹膜:一项随机研究。
Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Oct;90(4 Pt 1):622-7. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00359-1.
4
To drain or not to drain: a retrospective study of closed-suction drainage following radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy.
Gynecol Oncol. 1993 Oct;51(1):46-9. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1993.1244.
5
Closed-suction drainage versus no drainage following radical abdominal hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for stage IB cervical cancer.
Gynecol Oncol. 1995 May;57(2):232-4. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1995.1131.
6
The effect of nonperitonization and laparoscopic lymphadenectomy for minimizing the incidence of lymphocyst formation after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.非气腹和腹腔镜淋巴结清扫术对减少宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术后淋巴囊肿形成的影响。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010 Apr;20(3):443-8. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181d1895f.
7
Retroperitoneal drainage versus no drainage after pelvic lymphadenectomy for the prevention of lymphocyst formation in women with gynaecological malignancies.盆腔淋巴结清扫术后行腹膜后引流与不引流对预防妇科恶性肿瘤患者淋巴囊肿形成的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 29;6(6):CD007387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007387.pub4.
8
Retroperitoneal drainage versus no drainage after pelvic lymphadenectomy for the prevention of lymphocyst formation in patients with gynaecological malignancies.盆腔淋巴结清扫术后腹膜后引流与不引流对预防妇科恶性肿瘤患者淋巴囊肿形成的作用
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20(1):CD007387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007387.pub2.
9
Prevention of lymphocyst formation following systematic lymphadenectomy.系统性淋巴结清扫术后预防淋巴管囊肿形成。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2000 Sep;30(9):397-400.
10
Retroperitoneal drainage versus no drainage after pelvic lymphadenectomy for the prevention of lymphocyst formation in patients with gynaecological malignancies.盆腔淋巴结清扫术后行腹膜后引流与不引流对预防妇科恶性肿瘤患者淋巴囊肿形成的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 4;2014(6):CD007387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007387.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Perioperative management in gynecological surgery based on the ERAS program.基于加速康复外科(ERAS)方案的妇科手术围手术期管理
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2022 Feb;44(2):202-210. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1743401. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
2
Predictors of Lymphoceles in Women Who Underwent Laparotomic Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Early Gynecologic Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.妇科癌症腹腔镜腹膜后淋巴结清扫术后女性发生淋巴囊肿的预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 15;16(6):936. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16060936.
3
Interdepartmental Spread of Innovations: A Multicentre Study of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Programme.
创新的跨部门传播:一项关于手术后加速康复计划的多中心研究。
World J Surg. 2018 Aug;42(8):2348-2355. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4495-z.
4
Retroperitoneal drainage versus no drainage after pelvic lymphadenectomy for the prevention of lymphocyst formation in women with gynaecological malignancies.盆腔淋巴结清扫术后行腹膜后引流与不引流对预防妇科恶性肿瘤患者淋巴囊肿形成的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 29;6(6):CD007387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007387.pub4.
5
Analysis of the effect of adjuvant radiotherapy on outcomes and complications after radical hysterectomy in FIGO stage IB1 cervical cancer patients with intermediate risk factors (GOTIC Study).FIGO IB1期宫颈癌且具有中度危险因素患者根治性子宫切除术后辅助放疗对结局和并发症影响的分析(GOTIC研究)
World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun 29;14(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-0931-4.
6
Enhanced recovery programme in gynaecology: outcomes of a hysterectomy care pathway.妇科增强康复计划:子宫切除护理路径的结果
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2015 Jul 9;4(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u206142.w2524. eCollection 2015.
7
Wound drainage following groin dissection for malignant disease in adults.成人恶性疾病腹股沟淋巴结清扫术后的伤口引流
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 11;2014(11):CD010933. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010933.pub2.
8
Retroperitoneal drainage versus no drainage after pelvic lymphadenectomy for the prevention of lymphocyst formation in patients with gynaecological malignancies.盆腔淋巴结清扫术后行腹膜后引流与不引流对预防妇科恶性肿瘤患者淋巴囊肿形成的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 4;2014(6):CD007387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007387.pub3.
9
Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of early cervical cancer.腹腔镜辅助根治性阴道子宫切除术与根治性腹式子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 1;2013(10):CD006651. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006651.pub3.
10
Fast-track surgery in gynaecology and gynaecologic oncology: a review of a rolling clinical audit.妇科及妇科肿瘤学中的快速康复外科:一项滚动临床审计的综述
ISRN Surg. 2012;2012:368014. doi: 10.5402/2012/368014. Epub 2012 Dec 24.