Suppr超能文献

使用视觉辅助工具检查麻醉机。性能是否有所改善?

The use of a visual aid to check anaesthetic machines. Is performance improved?

作者信息

Groves J, Edwards N, Carr B

机构信息

Department of Anaesthetics, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 1994 Feb;49(2):122-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1994.tb03367.x.

Abstract

We asked 20 anaesthetists and seven operating department assistants to check three anaesthetic machines 'doctored' to contain errors of varying seriousness, and recorded their performances. Two weeks later we asked the same group to repeat the test. On the second occasion they followed a visual aid and filled in a questionnaire about the test. Participants showed a significant improvement in the rate of fault detection when using the aid (p < 0.05). The visual aid was most useful at increasing the detection rate of machine leaks. Of the participants, 60% considered that the visual aid was helpful and 74% thought that such an aid should be available in our theatre complex. Sixty-six percent of those questioned felt that a formal check list would be of use.

摘要

我们让20名麻醉师和7名手术室助理检查三台经过“处理”的麻醉机,这些麻醉机存在不同严重程度的错误,并记录他们的表现。两周后,我们让同一组人员重复该测试。第二次测试时,他们使用了视觉辅助工具,并填写了一份关于测试的问卷。使用该辅助工具时,参与者在故障检测率方面有显著提高(p < 0.05)。视觉辅助工具在提高机器泄漏检测率方面最有用。在参与者中,60%认为视觉辅助工具很有帮助,74%认为在我们的手术室区域应该配备这样的辅助工具。66%的受访者认为正式的检查表会有用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验