Suppr超能文献

用于区分凋亡亚群的细胞和细胞核流式细胞术技术比较

Comparison of cellular and nuclear flow cytometric techniques for discriminating apoptotic subpopulations.

作者信息

Elstein K H, Zucker R M

机构信息

ManTech Environmental Technology, Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709.

出版信息

Exp Cell Res. 1994 Apr;211(2):322-31. doi: 10.1006/excr.1994.1094.

Abstract

We compared cellular flow cytometric methods employing carboxyfluorescein (CF), Höechst 33342, and Höechst 33258 with a nuclear method in their ability to discriminate apoptotic subpopulations in rat thymocyte cultures exposed to dexamethasone or tributyltin. In the nuclear technique, apoptotic cells appeared as a single population containing reduced DNA content, while in the cellular techniques, apoptotic cells appeared as two or more subpopulations exhibiting increased fluorescence. Of these subpopulations, early apoptotic cells [which excluded propidium iodide (PI), indicating maintenance of membrane integrity] exhibited higher fluorescence but the same level of axial light loss (i.e., size/refractive index) as viable cells; late apoptotic and dead cells (which incorporated PI) exhibited decreased axial light loss. However, while the Höechst dyes allowed discrimination of late apoptotic from dead cells, CF did not. In comparing sensitivity to staining conditions, Höechst 33258 fluorescence was the most stable over time, Höechst 33342 the least, and CF fluorescence not only varied with time, but with tri-n-butyltin methoxide concentration. Comparison of single-parameter analyses revealed that axial light loss was sensitive only to late apoptotic changes; nuclear fluorescence was a better indicator of apoptotic subpopulations, but still underestimated the total percentage of affected cells, and Höechst 33342 distinguished early apoptotic cells as those with elevated fluorescence. Early apoptotic cells stained with Höechst 33258 also exhibited increased fluorescence, but could not be distinguished from late apoptotic and dead cells without a second parameter. These findings indicate that of the methods investigated, the method of choice for detecting apoptosis depends on the goal of analysis: Höechst 33258 was best for discriminating apoptotic subpopulations, and CF was best for assessing alterations of membrane fluidity. For single-parameter analyses, Höechst 33258 was best for determining the total percentage of affected cells, while Höechst 33342 could be used to determine the percentage in early apoptosis.

摘要

我们将采用羧基荧光素(CF)、Hoechst 33342和Hoechst 33258的细胞流式细胞术方法与一种核方法进行了比较,以评估它们在鉴别暴露于地塞米松或三丁基锡的大鼠胸腺细胞培养物中凋亡亚群的能力。在核技术中,凋亡细胞表现为一个DNA含量减少的单一群体,而在细胞技术中,凋亡细胞表现为两个或更多个荧光增强的亚群。在这些亚群中,早期凋亡细胞(排除碘化丙啶(PI),表明膜完整性得以维持)表现出较高的荧光,但与活细胞具有相同水平的轴向光散射(即大小/折射率);晚期凋亡和死亡细胞(摄取PI)表现出轴向光散射降低。然而,虽然Hoechst染料能够区分晚期凋亡细胞和死亡细胞,但CF不能。在比较对染色条件的敏感性时,Hoechst 33258荧光随时间最稳定,Hoechst 33342最不稳定,而CF荧光不仅随时间变化,还随三丁基锡甲醇浓度变化。单参数分析的比较显示,轴向光散射仅对晚期凋亡变化敏感;核荧光是凋亡亚群的更好指标,但仍低估了受影响细胞的总百分比,并且Hoechst 33342将早期凋亡细胞鉴别为荧光增强的细胞。用Hoechst 33258染色的早期凋亡细胞也表现出荧光增强,但如果没有第二个参数,则无法与晚期凋亡和死亡细胞区分开来。这些发现表明,在所研究的方法中,检测凋亡的首选方法取决于分析目的:Hoechst 33258最适合鉴别凋亡亚群,而CF最适合评估膜流动性的改变。对于单参数分析,Hoechst 33258最适合确定受影响细胞的总百分比,而Hoechst 33342可用于确定早期凋亡的百分比。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验