Kinoshita S, Okada F, Konishi G, Kinoshita M, Ito Y
Health Administration Center, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
J Electrocardiol. 1994 Apr;27(2):169-74. doi: 10.1016/s0022-0736(05)80101-3.
Recently, it has been shown that when a sinus impulse falls late in the parasystolic cycle, it usually hastens the next ectopic discharge. Thus, in many cases, the classic criteria for the diagnosis of parasystole (ie, varying coupling intervals and constant shortest interectopic intervals) cannot be used. To differentiate between parasystole and extrasystoles in such cases, the influence of vagal stimulation on parasystolic impulse formation was investigated in seven cases of "true" parasystole in which one or more "pure" ectopic cycles without any intervening nonectopic QRS complexes were found spontaneously. In all cases pure ectopic cycles were found during sinus arrest caused by vagal stimulation; namely, none of the cases showed extreme prolongation of the parasystolic cycle. These results strongly suggest that instead of the classic criteria, vagal stimulation causing temporary sinus arrest is the optimal method for differentiation between parasystole and extrasystoles in cases without spontaneous pure ectopic cycles.
最近研究表明,当窦性冲动落在并行心律周期的晚期时,通常会加速下一次异位搏动。因此,在许多情况下,并行心律诊断的经典标准(即耦合间期变化和最短异位间期恒定)无法使用。为了在这些情况下鉴别并行心律和期前收缩,对7例“真正的”并行心律患者进行了迷走神经刺激对并行心律冲动形成影响的研究,这些患者中可自发发现一个或多个“纯”异位周期,其间无任何插入的非异位QRS波群。在所有病例中,迷走神经刺激导致窦性停搏期间均发现了纯异位周期;也就是说,没有一例出现并行心律周期的极度延长。这些结果强烈提示,对于没有自发纯异位周期的病例,导致暂时窦性停搏的迷走神经刺激是鉴别并行心律和期前收缩的最佳方法,而非经典标准。