Suppr超能文献

并行心律与期前收缩的鉴别。迷走神经刺激对并行心律冲动形成的影响。

Differentiation between parasystole and extrasystoles. Influence of vagal stimulation on parasystolic impulse formation.

作者信息

Kinoshita S, Okada F, Konishi G, Kinoshita M, Ito Y

机构信息

Health Administration Center, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.

出版信息

J Electrocardiol. 1994 Apr;27(2):169-74. doi: 10.1016/s0022-0736(05)80101-3.

Abstract

Recently, it has been shown that when a sinus impulse falls late in the parasystolic cycle, it usually hastens the next ectopic discharge. Thus, in many cases, the classic criteria for the diagnosis of parasystole (ie, varying coupling intervals and constant shortest interectopic intervals) cannot be used. To differentiate between parasystole and extrasystoles in such cases, the influence of vagal stimulation on parasystolic impulse formation was investigated in seven cases of "true" parasystole in which one or more "pure" ectopic cycles without any intervening nonectopic QRS complexes were found spontaneously. In all cases pure ectopic cycles were found during sinus arrest caused by vagal stimulation; namely, none of the cases showed extreme prolongation of the parasystolic cycle. These results strongly suggest that instead of the classic criteria, vagal stimulation causing temporary sinus arrest is the optimal method for differentiation between parasystole and extrasystoles in cases without spontaneous pure ectopic cycles.

摘要

最近研究表明,当窦性冲动落在并行心律周期的晚期时,通常会加速下一次异位搏动。因此,在许多情况下,并行心律诊断的经典标准(即耦合间期变化和最短异位间期恒定)无法使用。为了在这些情况下鉴别并行心律和期前收缩,对7例“真正的”并行心律患者进行了迷走神经刺激对并行心律冲动形成影响的研究,这些患者中可自发发现一个或多个“纯”异位周期,其间无任何插入的非异位QRS波群。在所有病例中,迷走神经刺激导致窦性停搏期间均发现了纯异位周期;也就是说,没有一例出现并行心律周期的极度延长。这些结果强烈提示,对于没有自发纯异位周期的病例,导致暂时窦性停搏的迷走神经刺激是鉴别并行心律和期前收缩的最佳方法,而非经典标准。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验