• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本癌症疼痛管理与姑息治疗的近期进展

Recent progress in cancer pain management and palliative care in Japan.

作者信息

Takeda F, Uki J

机构信息

WHO Collaborating Center for Cancer Relief and Quality of Life, Saitama Cancer Center, Japan.

出版信息

Ann Acad Med Singap. 1994 Mar;23(2):296-9.

PMID:7521622
Abstract

One out of every four deaths in Japan is due to cancer, so that health-care workers and the lay public have gradually become aware of the importance of cancer pain relief and palliative care in recent years. In 1984, the feasibility and effectiveness of the WHO method for relief of cancer pain was demonstrated in Japanese cancer patients. Thereafter, information on the latest knowledge and skills in cancer pain relief and palliative care has been disseminated through medical meetings, publications and mass communication networks. The national government published manuals of care for terminally ill cancer patients and amended narcotics regulation in order to improve the accessibility of opioid analgesics, especially morphine, to cancer patients with pain. These activities resulted in a 35-fold increase in the annual consumption of morphine preparations for medical purposes between 1979 and 1992. However, the annual consumption per capita is still much smaller than that in other developed countries, indicating the need for further information dissemination and professional education in the implementation of palliative care programmes.

摘要

在日本,每四例死亡中就有一例归因于癌症,因此近年来医护人员和普通民众逐渐意识到缓解癌症疼痛及姑息治疗的重要性。1984年,世界卫生组织缓解癌症疼痛方法在日本癌症患者中得到了可行性和有效性验证。此后,有关癌症疼痛缓解及姑息治疗的最新知识和技能信息通过医学会议、出版物及大众传播网络得以传播。国家政府发布了晚期癌症患者护理手册,并修订了麻醉品管理规定,以提高癌症疼痛患者获取阿片类镇痛药,尤其是吗啡的便利性。这些举措使得1979年至1992年间用于医疗目的的吗啡制剂年消费量增长了35倍。然而,人均年消费量仍远低于其他发达国家,这表明在实施姑息治疗方案方面仍需进一步开展信息传播和专业教育。

相似文献

1
Recent progress in cancer pain management and palliative care in Japan.日本癌症疼痛管理与姑息治疗的近期进展
Ann Acad Med Singap. 1994 Mar;23(2):296-9.
2
Development of cancer pain relief and palliative care in the Philippines.菲律宾癌症疼痛缓解与姑息治疗的发展
Ann Acad Med Singap. 1994 Mar;23(2):292-5.
3
[Current status of implementation in Japan of the WHO guidelines for cancer pain relief and future perspectives].[世界卫生组织癌症疼痛缓解指南在日本的实施现状及未来展望]
Nihon Rinsho. 2001 Sep;59(9):1663-8.
4
The development of use of oral morphine within the last 10 years in Japan.过去10年日本口服吗啡的使用发展情况。
Eur J Pain. 2001;5 Suppl A:79-82. doi: 10.1053/eujp.2001.0285.
5
Changing attitudes towards narcotic use in cancer pain management in Japan.日本癌症疼痛管理中对麻醉药品使用态度的转变。
Postgrad Med J. 1991;67 Suppl 2:S31-4.
6
[Present status and issues of pain palliation in Japan].[日本疼痛缓解的现状与问题]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2009 Dec;36 Suppl 1:1-4.
7
[Knowledge of palliative care which a surgeon should know].
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 2004 Jul;105(7):418-21.
8
Freedom from pain--a mirage or a possibility? Experience in attempts to change laws and practices in India.摆脱痛苦——是海市蜃楼还是一种可能?印度在试图改变法律与实践方面的经验。
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2003;17(3-4):1-9; discussion 11-2.
9
Toward freedom from cancer pain in Japan.迈向日本癌症疼痛的缓解
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2007;21(3):37-42.
10
Recent developments in the management of cancer pain in Japan: education, clinical guidelines and basic research.日本癌症疼痛管理的最新进展:教育、临床指南和基础研究。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2012 Dec;42(12):1120-7. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hys155. Epub 2012 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Order effects: a randomised study of three major cancer-specific quality of life instruments.顺序效应:三种主要癌症特异性生活质量量表的随机研究
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005 May 31;3:37. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-3-37.
2
Validation of the English and Chinese versions of the Quick-FLIC quality of life questionnaire.快速FLIC生活质量问卷中英文版本的验证
Br J Cancer. 2005 Feb 28;92(4):668-72. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602399.