Pawelec G, Kalbacher H, Pohla H, Boshell M, Max H, Friccius H, Adibzadeh M, Hambrecht A, Sansom D
Section for Transplantation Immunology and Immunohaematology, Medizinische Universitätsklinik, Tübingen, Germany.
Cell Immunol. 1994 Oct 1;158(1):241-52. doi: 10.1006/cimm.1994.1271.
The "two signal" concept for T cell activation is widely accepted. Signal 1 is commonly delivered via the antigen receptor, and signal 2 via accessory interactions. Delivery of both signals results in activation, signal 1 alone in induction of hyporesponsiveness. The nature of signal 1 in alloreactivity is not completely clear; most evidence suggests that a complex of foreign major histocompatibility complex molecules and their bound peptides is recognized. Interactions between B7 (CD80) ligand and CD28/CTLA-4 receptors are currently considered the most important sources of signal 2. Xenogeneic cells transfected with human genes provide useful stimulators for dissecting signals 1 and 2 in alloreactivity. We show here that the majority of DR-specific alloreactive T cell clones (TCC) fails to recognize Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells transfected with human DR, whether or not these are cotransfected with genes for CD80 or LFA-3. Stimulation was not observed even in the presence of a pool of peptides isolated by low pH release from B cell line (BCL)-derived DR molecules, or in the presence of synthetic peptides corresponding to the sequences of the three most commonly identified endogenous peptides. Lack of recognition was observed both in failure to stimulate proliferation and in failure to induce anergy. However, one TCC was identified which responded weakly to DR+ CHO cells, and for this clone, the presence of either CD80 or LFA-3 strongly enhanced proliferative responses. Anergy was not induced, even in the absence of CD80. Immobilized HLA-DR molecules purified from a BCL also failed to stimulate proliferation, but unlike the CHO transfectants, they did induce anergy. Stimulation with BCL also induced anergy if CD80-dependent interactions were blocked with soluble CTLA-4-Ig receptor. These results are consistent with the model that DR molecules expressed in the absence of appropriate peptide are simply not recognized by most alloreactive T cells, whereas DR molecules containing appropriate bound peptide are recognized as signal 1 and induce anergy. CTLA-4-Ig blocking confirms that CD80-dependent interactions can be important in preventing anergy induction, but that they are not always necessary is illustrated by the existence of a single clone which recognized DR molecules on CHO transfectants, giving very weak proliferation without CD80, and nonetheless no anergy induction.
T细胞激活的“双信号”概念已被广泛接受。信号1通常通过抗原受体传递,信号2通过辅助相互作用传递。两种信号的传递导致激活,单独的信号1则诱导低反应性。同种异体反应中信号1的本质尚不完全清楚;大多数证据表明,识别的是外来主要组织相容性复合体分子及其结合肽的复合物。B7(CD80)配体与CD28/CTLA-4受体之间的相互作用目前被认为是信号2的最重要来源。用人类基因转染的异种细胞为剖析同种异体反应中的信号1和信号2提供了有用的刺激物。我们在此表明,大多数DR特异性同种异体反应性T细胞克隆(TCC)无法识别转染了人类DR的中国仓鼠卵巢(CHO)细胞,无论这些细胞是否与CD80或LFA-3基因共转染。即使存在通过低pH从B细胞系(BCL)衍生的DR分子中释放分离的肽库,或存在与三种最常见鉴定的内源性肽序列相对应的合成肽,也未观察到刺激。在未能刺激增殖和未能诱导无反应性方面均观察到缺乏识别。然而,鉴定出一个对DR+CHO细胞反应较弱的TCC,对于该克隆,CD80或LFA-3的存在强烈增强了增殖反应。即使没有CD80也未诱导无反应性。从BCL纯化的固定化HLA-DR分子也未能刺激增殖,但与CHO转染细胞不同,它们确实诱导了无反应性。如果用可溶性CTLA-4-Ig受体阻断CD80依赖性相互作用,用BCL刺激也会诱导无反应性。这些结果与以下模型一致,即大多数同种异体反应性T细胞无法识别在没有适当肽的情况下表达的DR分子,而含有适当结合肽的DR分子被识别为信号1并诱导无反应性。CTLA-4-Ig阻断证实CD80依赖性相互作用在防止无反应性诱导中可能很重要,但单个克隆的存在表明它们并非总是必要的,该克隆识别CHO转染细胞上的DR分子,在没有CD80的情况下增殖非常弱,但仍未诱导无反应性。