Suppr超能文献

氨氯地平或依那普利治疗轻、中度高血压患者期间生活质量、安全性及疗效的双盲、长期、对照多中心研究

A double-blind, long-term, comparative study on quality of life, safety, and efficacy during treatment with amlodipine or enalapril in mild or moderate hypertensive patients: a multicenter study.

作者信息

Omvik P, Thaulow E, Herland O B, Eide I, Midha R, Turner R R

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Haukeland Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1993;22 Suppl A:S13-9.

PMID:7522282
Abstract

Amlodipine (5-10 mg, once daily) and enalapril (10-40 mg, once daily) were compared in terms of quality of life, efficacy, and tolerability, in a multicenter, double-blind trial lasting for 50 weeks in 461 mild or moderate hypertensive patients. Both drugs were similarly effective in lowering blood pressure while maintaining quality of life. Apart from class-typical effects, such as edema for calcium antagonists, and cough for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, both drugs were equally well tolerated, with few adverse effects of clinical significance. Only a few patients [eight amlodipine (4%); nine enalapril (4%)] were withdrawn from the trial due to drug-related adverse events, demonstrating that tolerability was good. Neutral to slightly beneficial effects were found in blood lipid concentrations after treatment with amlodipine. Both drugs reduced the calculated risk of coronary heart disease over the next 10 years. It was concluded that amlodipine compared favorably with enalapril as an effective and well-tolerated antihypertensive drug.

摘要

在一项针对461例轻度或中度高血压患者的多中心、双盲试验中,对氨氯地平(5 - 10毫克,每日一次)和依那普利(10 - 40毫克,每日一次)在生活质量、疗效和耐受性方面进行了比较。两种药物在降低血压的同时维持生活质量方面同样有效。除了类别典型的效应,如钙拮抗剂引起的水肿和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂引起的咳嗽外,两种药物的耐受性同样良好,几乎没有具有临床意义的不良反应。仅有少数患者[氨氯地平组8例(4%);依那普利组9例(4%)]因与药物相关的不良事件退出试验,表明耐受性良好。氨氯地平治疗后血脂浓度有中性至轻度有益影响。两种药物均降低了未来10年冠心病的计算风险。结论是,氨氯地平作为一种有效且耐受性良好的抗高血压药物,与依那普利相比具有优势。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验