Rudiak D, Marg E
School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley 94720.
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1994 Oct;93(5):358-71. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(94)90124-4.
The depth of threshold magnetic nerve stimulation can be estimated by using thresholds from two different-sized stimulus coils and plotting their induced electric field vs. depth profiles. Stimulation is presumed to take place where the two field profiles are equal. If the two coils have unequal inductances, however, there is a relative shift in threshold between coils that alters the intersection point and the apparent stimulus depth. This systematic error arises from two sources: (1) there is a difference in the fraction of stimulator energy reaching each coil, and (2) pulse durations are different, causing threshold shifts governed by the nerve strength-duration curve. Both sources of error are additive. If the larger coil has the lesser inductance, stimulus depth is underestimated; if it has the greater inductance, it is overestimated. This can lead to large disparities in the measured depth, depending on the sets of coils used. In this paper, we show how to correct for errors introduced by unequal inductance and how this resolves discrepancies in depth measurement. Our own depth measurements in the motor area for threshold finger movements, and recalculated depths from Epstein et al., indicate that stimulation is slightly deeper (18-21 mm, average 19+ mm) than previously thought. This suggests that threshold magnetic stimulation in the motor area may arise from large, tangentially oriented fibers in the superficial white matter, or in the gray matter at the upper sulcus or lip of the gyrus.
可通过使用两个不同尺寸刺激线圈的阈值并绘制其感应电场与深度曲线来估计阈值磁神经刺激的深度。刺激被认为发生在两个场曲线相等的地方。然而,如果两个线圈的电感不相等,线圈之间的阈值会有相对偏移,这会改变交点和表观刺激深度。这种系统误差源于两个方面:(1)到达每个线圈的刺激器能量比例存在差异,(2)脉冲持续时间不同,导致阈值偏移受神经强度-持续时间曲线支配。这两个误差源是相加的。如果较大的线圈电感较小,刺激深度会被低估;如果其电感较大,刺激深度会被高估。这可能导致根据所使用的线圈组,测量深度出现很大差异。在本文中,我们展示了如何校正由不等电感引入的误差以及这如何解决深度测量中的差异。我们自己在运动区进行的阈值手指运动深度测量以及根据爱泼斯坦等人重新计算的深度表明,刺激深度比之前认为的略深(18 - 21毫米,平均19 +毫米)。这表明运动区的阈值磁刺激可能源于浅表白质中或脑回上沟或边缘灰质中较大的切向纤维。