Savion S, Oddo S, Grover S, Caspi R R
Laboratory of Immunology, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.
J Neuroimmunol. 1994 Nov;55(1):35-44. doi: 10.1016/0165-5728(94)90144-9.
A possible correlation between the pathogenicity of autoimmune T cells and their lymphokine production, expression of functional adhesion molecules and expression of some surface antigens was examined. We used four retinal antigen-specific Lewis rat T cell lines and sublines: one specific to the major pathogenic epitope of the human retinal soluble antigen (S-Ag; residues 337-356), and three specific to the major pathogenic epitope of the bovine interphotoreceptor retinoid binding protein (IRBP; residues 1177-1191). The lines have different degrees of uveitogenicity, from highly pathogenic to nonpathogenic. All four T cell lines produced roughly equivalent amounts of interferon-gamma, lymphotoxin/tumor necrosis factor (TNF alpha/beta), interleukin-3, interleukin-6 and transforming growth factor-beta. Interleukin-4 activity could not be detected. The lines also expressed similar levels of functional adhesion molecules, as measured by binding to cultured rat aorta endothelial cells. The nonpathogenic subline, however, was the lowest responder to antigenic stimulation with respect to proliferation and interleukin-2 production. Examination of cell surface antigens showed that in contrast to the other lines, the majority of cells in the nonpathogenic subline lacked detectable expression of CD4. No difference was found in the level of expression of the IL-2 receptor and T cell antigen receptor among the four lines. Because CD4 is the restricting element in these lines, reduced CD4 expression in the nonpathogenic subline may at least partially explain its poor response in vitro to antigenic stimulation. All three attributes could be connected to lack of pathogenicity of this line in vivo. These results support the contention that class II-restricted recognition of autoantigen within the neuroretina by uveitogenic T lymphocytes must occur as an initial step in the pathogenesis of EAU. A defect in this step will preclude pathogenesis regardless of some other functional attributes possessed by effector T cells, such as production of inflammatory lymphokines and expression of adhesion molecules.
研究了自身免疫性T细胞的致病性与其淋巴因子产生、功能性黏附分子表达以及某些表面抗原表达之间可能存在的相关性。我们使用了四种视网膜抗原特异性的Lewis大鼠T细胞系和亚系:一种针对人视网膜可溶性抗原(S-Ag;第337 - 356位氨基酸残基)的主要致病表位,另外三种针对牛视网膜色素上皮间维生素A结合蛋白(IRBP;第1177 - 1191位氨基酸残基)的主要致病表位。这些细胞系具有不同程度的葡萄膜炎致炎能力,从高致病性到无致病性。所有这四种T细胞系产生的干扰素-γ、淋巴毒素/肿瘤坏死因子(TNFα/β)、白细胞介素-3、白细胞介素-6和转化生长因子-β的量大致相当。未检测到白细胞介素-4活性。通过与培养的大鼠主动脉内皮细胞结合测定,这些细胞系表达的功能性黏附分子水平也相似。然而,无致病性亚系在增殖和白细胞介素-2产生方面,对抗原刺激的反应是最低的。细胞表面抗原检测显示,与其他细胞系相比,无致病性亚系中的大多数细胞缺乏可检测到的CD4表达。在这四种细胞系中,白细胞介素-2受体和T细胞抗原受体的表达水平没有差异。由于CD4是这些细胞系中的限制元件,无致病性亚系中CD4表达降低可能至少部分解释了其在体外对抗原刺激反应不佳的原因。所有这三个特性都可能与该细胞系在体内缺乏致病性有关。这些结果支持了这样的观点,即致葡萄膜炎性T淋巴细胞对神经视网膜内自身抗原的II类限制性识别必须作为实验性自身免疫性葡萄膜炎发病机制的初始步骤。这一步骤的缺陷将排除发病机制,而无论效应T细胞具有的其他一些功能特性如何,如炎性淋巴因子的产生和黏附分子的表达。