Hampton J R
Queen's Medical Centre, University Hospital, Nottingham, England.
Drugs. 1994 Oct;48(4):549-68. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199448040-00005.
beta-Blockers have been in clinical use for 30 years, and have an accepted role in (among others) the treatment of high blood pressure, the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction and the treatment of arrhythmias. Their place in the treatment of heart failure is currently under investigation. The drugs available in the 1970s and early 1980s were subjected to intense investigation. A new generation of beta-blockers, including some such as carvedilol and bucindolol, with vasodilating properties, is now appearing. As yet these later agents have not been the subject of large clinical trials. Clinical practice involves the treatment of individual patients with defined dosages of particular drugs. It is, therefore, not acceptable to base practice on theories derived from the clinical pharmacology of a particular drug, on the results of small trials or on a meta-analysis of results from a number of trials that were individually inadequate. Clinical practice must follow the results of large-scale trials in defined populations. The major trials in hypertension, myocardial infarction, arrhythmias and heart failure provide the best evidence for the use of individual beta-blockers in each of these clinical situations. In patients with high blood pressure, beta-blockers do not seem to have any particular advantage over other hypotensive agents. In myocardial infarction, relatively late use of a beta-blocker undoubtedly reduces fatality, though the value of early treatment is less clear. beta-Blockers are not powerful antiarrhythmics, but they do appear to prevent sudden death. Their possible role in heart failure is perhaps the most interesting current field of beta-blocker research. There are very few comparative studies of beta-blockers, and it is difficult to make precise recommendations. None of the new generation of beta-blockers has yet been used in a trial that is large enough trial for any of them to be accepted for routine use in preference to older drugs. The use of individual beta-blockers, as with any drug, should follow the results of clinical trials. Propranolol and atenolol have been studied most intensely in hypertension. For secondary prevention of myocardial infarction, the evidence is best for timolol. Sotalol is probably the best antiarrhythmic among the beta-blockers. Whether any individual beta-blocker is best for heart failure remains to be seen.
β受体阻滞剂已临床应用30年,在(包括但不限于)高血压治疗、心肌梗死二级预防及心律失常治疗中具有公认的作用。其在心力衰竭治疗中的地位目前正在研究中。20世纪70年代和80年代初可用的此类药物曾接受过深入研究。新一代β受体阻滞剂,包括如卡维地洛和布新洛尔等具有血管舒张特性的药物,目前正在出现。然而,这些较新的药物尚未成为大型临床试验的对象。临床实践涉及用特定药物的规定剂量治疗个体患者。因此,基于特定药物临床药理学的理论、小型试验结果或对一些个体试验结果不充分的试验进行的荟萃分析来开展实践是不可接受的。临床实践必须遵循在特定人群中进行的大规模试验结果。高血压、心肌梗死、心律失常和心力衰竭方面的主要试验为在这些临床情况中使用个体β受体阻滞剂提供了最佳证据。在高血压患者中,β受体阻滞剂似乎并不比其他降压药有任何特别优势。在心肌梗死中,相对较晚使用β受体阻滞剂无疑可降低死亡率,尽管早期治疗的价值尚不太明确。β受体阻滞剂并非强效抗心律失常药,但它们似乎确实能预防猝死。其在心力衰竭中可能的作用或许是目前β受体阻滞剂研究中最有趣的领域。β受体阻滞剂的比较研究非常少,难以做出精确推荐。新一代β受体阻滞剂中,尚无任何一种在足够大的试验中使用过,以至于能被接受优先于旧药用于常规治疗。与任何药物一样,个体β受体阻滞剂的使用应遵循临床试验结果。普萘洛尔和阿替洛尔在高血压研究中最为深入。对于心肌梗死的二级预防,噻吗洛尔的证据最为充分。索他洛尔可能是β受体阻滞剂中最佳的抗心律失常药。任何一种个体β受体阻滞剂是否最适合心力衰竭治疗还有待观察。