Bailey C R, Fisher A R, Wielogorski A K
Department of Anaesthetics, Guy's Hospital, London.
Br Heart J. 1994 Nov;72(5):442-5. doi: 10.1136/hrt.72.5.442.
To determine reheparinisation requirements following protamine neutralisation after the discontinuation of cardiopulmonary bypass in a group of patients receiving "low dose" aprotinin compared with a control group.
Randomised, placebo controlled study.
Regional cardiothoracic unit within a district general hospital.
20 patients were consecutively allocated to one of two groups. All patients had a primary elective aortocoronary bypass operation using standard anaesthetic techniques and no patient was withdrawn from the study.
Aprotinin group patients (n = 9) received aprotinin (1 x 10(6) kallikrein inactivator units (KIU)) as an intravenous bolus after the induction of anaesthesia, and 1 x 10(6) KIU was added to the pump prime. Control group patients (n = 11) received 0.9% saline placebo.
Activated clotting time (ACT), heparin concentration, and heparin dose response (HDR) measured before, during, and after bypass. The HDR is an accurate method to determine the patients' in vitro response to heparin and is used to predict the dose of heparin required to attain an ACT of 400 seconds.
Activated clotting times were similar in the two groups for the duration of the study. Heparin concentrations were zero in all patients before heparin administration and after protamine neutralisation. During bypass there was no difference between the groups. The median heparin dose response was the same in the two groups before the administration of heparin, but after the neutralisation of heparin with protamine after the discontinuation of bypass the HDR was significantly higher in the aprotinin group for up to one hour (median of 2.9 IU/ml v 1.25 in the control group at 10 minutes after protamine neutralisation, P < 0.01; 2.5 v 1.45 at 30 minutes, P < 0.05; and 2.9 v 1.6 at one hour, P < 0.001).
Heparin requirements were nearly doubled in patients treated with aprotinin, who required reheparinisation for up to one hour after protamine. This relative "heparin resistance" cannot be explained by the presence of excessive protamine. Aprotinin may be a substrate for the N-carboxypeptidase that destroys protamine, thus indirectly enhancing and prolonging the activity of protamine.
确定在一组接受“低剂量”抑肽酶治疗的患者与对照组相比,体外循环停止后鱼精蛋白中和后重新肝素化的需求。
随机、安慰剂对照研究。
地区综合医院内的区域心胸外科病房。
20例患者连续被分配到两组中的一组。所有患者均采用标准麻醉技术进行择期主动脉冠状动脉搭桥手术,无患者退出研究。
抑肽酶组患者(n = 9)在麻醉诱导后静脉推注抑肽酶(1×10⁶激肽释放酶灭活单位(KIU)),并在预充液中加入1×10⁶ KIU。对照组患者(n = 11)接受0.9%生理盐水安慰剂。
在体外循环前、期间和之后测量活化凝血时间(ACT)、肝素浓度和肝素剂量反应(HDR)。HDR是确定患者体外对肝素反应的准确方法,用于预测达到400秒ACT所需的肝素剂量。
在研究期间,两组的活化凝血时间相似。在肝素给药前和鱼精蛋白中和后,所有患者的肝素浓度均为零。在体外循环期间,两组之间无差异。在肝素给药前,两组的肝素剂量反应中位数相同,但在体外循环停止后用鱼精蛋白中和肝素后,抑肽酶组的HDR在长达一小时内显著更高(鱼精蛋白中和后10分钟时中位数为2.9 IU/ml,对照组为1.25,P < 0.01;30分钟时为2.5对1.45,P < 0.05;1小时时为2.9对1.6,P < 0.001)。
接受抑肽酶治疗的患者肝素需求量几乎增加了一倍,这些患者在鱼精蛋白后长达一小时需要重新肝素化。这种相对的“肝素抵抗”不能用过量鱼精蛋白的存在来解释。抑肽酶可能是破坏鱼精蛋白的N - 羧肽酶的底物,从而间接增强和延长鱼精蛋白的活性。