Simoes J P, Schoning P
Department of Pathology and Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506.
J Vet Diagn Invest. 1994 Oct;6(4):458-65. doi: 10.1177/104063879400600410.
Twelve histochemical methods; affinity staining with avidin peroxidase, wheat germ agglutinin, and concavalin-A agglutinin; and an immunohistochemical stain with Kp1 (CD68) antibody were compared for their relative effectiveness in staining canine mast cell tumors. Stains were compared in 28 mast cell tumors and 19 histiocytomas. The effectiveness of the histochemical methods and the lectins decreased as the mast cells became less differentiated. None of the staining methods were positive on histiocytomas. Periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) gave positive results in a few cases of mast cell tumors where other histochemical stains were negative. Although avidin peroxidase and Kp1 antibody stained more mast cell tumors than any other method, they did not differ significantly from Luna's method, toluidine blue pH 0.5, toluidine blue pH 4.5, alcian blue pH 2.5, safranin O, Unna's method, and Giemsa. No stain was ideal for the diagnosis of canine mast cell tumors; however, this study suggests that the use of avidin peroxidase, Kp1 antibody, and PAS may give additional information for individual poorly differentiated tumors without substantial increase in time or cost.
比较了十二种组织化学方法;用抗生物素蛋白过氧化物酶、麦胚凝集素和伴刀豆球蛋白A凝集素进行的亲和染色;以及用Kp1(CD68)抗体进行的免疫组织化学染色在犬肥大细胞瘤染色中的相对有效性。在28例肥大细胞瘤和19例组织细胞瘤中对这些染色方法进行了比较。随着肥大细胞分化程度降低,组织化学方法和凝集素的有效性降低。所有染色方法在组织细胞瘤上均为阴性。在一些其他组织化学染色为阴性的肥大细胞瘤病例中,过碘酸希夫(PAS)染色呈阳性。尽管抗生物素蛋白过氧化物酶和Kp1抗体染色的肥大细胞瘤比其他任何方法都多,但它们与卢娜氏方法、pH值0.5的甲苯胺蓝、pH值4.5的甲苯胺蓝、pH值2.5的阿尔辛蓝、番红O、昂纳氏方法和吉姆萨染色没有显著差异。没有一种染色对犬肥大细胞瘤的诊断是理想的;然而,这项研究表明,使用抗生物素蛋白过氧化物酶、Kp1抗体和PAS可能会为个别低分化肿瘤提供额外信息,而不会大幅增加时间或成本。