Suppr超能文献

分别使用光学聚集测定法和血小板计数法测定发现,与全血(及血浆)中的微聚集不同,人在体外循环后血浆中血小板的大聚集受到特异性损害。

Macroaggregation of platelets in plasma, as distinct from microaggregation in whole blood (and plasma), as determined using optical aggregometry and platelet counting respectively, is specifically impaired following cardiopulmonary bypass in man.

作者信息

Menys V C, Belcher P R, Noble M I, Evans R D, Drossos G E, Pillai R, Westaby S

机构信息

Department of Biological Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, UK.

出版信息

Thromb Haemost. 1994 Oct;72(4):511-8.

PMID:7533335
Abstract

We determined changes in platelet aggregability following cardiopulmonary bypass, using optical aggregometry to assess macroaggregation in platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and platelet counting to assess microaggregation both in whole blood and PRP. Hirudin was used as the anticoagulant to maintain normocalcaemia. Microaggregation (%, median and interquartile range) in blood stirred with collagen (0.6 micrograms/ml) was only marginally impaired following bypass (91 [88, 93] at 10 min postbypass v 95 (92, 96] prebypass; n = 22), whereas macroaggregation (amplitude of response; cm) in PRP stirred with collagen (1.0 micrograms/ml) was markedly impaired (9.5 [8.0, 10.8], n = 41 v 13.4 [12.7, 14.3], n = 10; p < 0.0001). However, in PRP, despite impairment of macroaggregation (9.1 [8.5, 10.1], n = 12), microaggregation was near-maximal (93 [91, 94]), as in whole blood stirred with collagen. In contrast, in aspirin-treated patients (n = 14), both collagen-induced microaggregation in whole blood (49 [47, 52]) and macroaggregation in PRP (5.1 [3.8, 6.6]) were more markedly impaired, compared with control (both p < 0.001). Similarly, in PRP, macroaggregation with ristocetin (1.5 mg/ml) was also impaired following bypass (9.4 [7.2, 10.7], n = 38 v 12.4 [10.0, 13.4]; p < 0.0002, n = 20), but as found with collagen, despite impairment of macroaggregation (7.2 [3.5, 10.9], n = 12), microaggregation was again near-maximal (96 [93, 97]). The response to ristocetin was more markedly impared after bypass in succinylated gelatin (Gelofusine) treated patients (5.6 [2.8, 8.6], n = 17; p < 0.005 v control), whereas the response to collagen was little different (9.3 v 9.5).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

我们采用光学聚集测定法评估富血小板血浆(PRP)中的大聚集,并通过血小板计数评估全血和PRP中的微聚集,以此来确定体外循环后血小板聚集性的变化。使用水蛭素作为抗凝剂以维持正常血钙水平。用胶原蛋白(0.6微克/毫升)搅拌的血液中的微聚集(%,中位数和四分位间距)在体外循环后仅略有受损(体外循环后10分钟时为91[88,93],术前为95[92,96];n = 22),而用胶原蛋白(1.0微克/毫升)搅拌的PRP中的大聚集(反应幅度;厘米)则明显受损(9.5[8.0,10.8],n = 41,对比13.4[12.7,14.3],n = 10;p < 0.0001)。然而,在PRP中,尽管大聚集受损(9.1[8.5,10.1],n = 12),但微聚集接近最大值(93[91,94]),如同用胶原蛋白搅拌的全血一样。相比之下,在阿司匹林治疗的患者(n = 14)中,与对照组相比,胶原蛋白诱导的全血微聚集(49[47,52])和PRP中的大聚集(5.1[3.8,6.6])均更明显受损(两者p < 0.001)。同样,在PRP中,用瑞斯托霉素(1.5毫克/毫升)诱导的大聚集在体外循环后也受损(9.4[7.2,10.7],n = 38,对比12.4[10.0,13.4];p < 0.0002,n = 20),但与胶原蛋白情况相同,尽管大聚集受损(7.2[3.5,10.9],n = 12),微聚集再次接近最大值(96[93,97])。在琥珀酰明胶(佳乐施)治疗的患者中,体外循环后对瑞斯托霉素的反应受损更明显(5.6[2.8,8.6],n = 17;与对照组相比p < 0.005),而对胶原蛋白的反应差异不大(9.3对比9.5)。(摘要截选至250词)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验