Fischbarg J, Cheung M, Li J, Iserovich P, Czegledy F, Kuang K, Garner M
Department of Physiology and Cellular Biophysics, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032.
Mol Cell Biochem. 1994 Nov 23;140(2):147-62. doi: 10.1007/BF00926753.
Given the sequence of transporters or channels of unknown secondary structure, it is usual to predict their putative transmembrane regions as alpha-helical. However, recent evidence for a facilitative glucose transporter (GLUT1) appears inconsistent with such predictions, which has led us to propose an alternative folding model for GLUTs based on the 16-stranded antiparallel beta-barrel of porins. Here we apply the same predictive algorithms we used for GLUTs to several other membrane proteins. For some of them, a high-resolution structure has been derived (beta-barrels: Rhodobacter capsulatus and Escherichia coli porins; multihelical: colicin A, bacteriorhodopsin, and reaction center L chain); we use them to test the prediction procedures. The other proteins we analyze (GLUT1, CHIP28, acetylcholine receptor alpha subunit, lac permease, Na(+)-glucose cotransporter, shaker K+ channel, sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+)-ATPase) are representative of classes of similar membrane proteins. As with GLUTs, we find that the predicted transmembrane segments of these proteins are consistently shorter than expected for transmembrane spanning alpha-helices, but are of the correct length and number for the proteins to fold instead as porin-like beta-barrels.
对于二级结构未知的转运蛋白或通道序列,通常将其假定的跨膜区域预测为α螺旋。然而,最近关于易化葡萄糖转运蛋白(GLUT1)的证据似乎与这些预测不一致,这促使我们基于孔蛋白的16股反平行β桶状结构提出一种GLUTs的替代折叠模型。在这里,我们将用于GLUTs的相同预测算法应用于其他几种膜蛋白。对于其中一些蛋白,已经获得了高分辨率结构(β桶状结构:荚膜红细菌和大肠杆菌孔蛋白;多螺旋结构:大肠杆菌素A、细菌视紫红质和反应中心L链);我们用它们来测试预测程序。我们分析的其他蛋白(GLUT1、CHIP28、乙酰胆碱受体α亚基、乳糖通透酶、Na(+) - 葡萄糖共转运蛋白、钾离子通道和肌浆网Ca(2+) - ATP酶)代表了类似膜蛋白的类别。与GLUTs一样,我们发现这些蛋白预测的跨膜片段始终比跨膜α螺旋预期的要短,但对于这些蛋白折叠成类似孔蛋白的β桶状结构来说,其长度和数量是正确的。