Clouston P D, Kiers L, Menkes D, Sander H, Chiappa K, Cros D
Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114, USA.
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995 Apr;97(2):114-25. doi: 10.1016/0924-980x(94)00310-4.
We examined the inhibitory effect of a brief train of digital (D2) electrical stimuli at 4 times perception threshold on transcranial magnetic motor evoked potentials (MEPs) recorded from abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and flexor carpi radialis (FCR) muscles ipsilateral to the side of D2 stimulation. We compared this to the inhibitory effect of ipsilateral D2 stimulation on averaged rectified EMG recorded at 10% maximum voluntary contraction and on F-responses and H-reflexes recorded from these same muscles. We also compared MEPs recorded following D2 stimulation just above perception threshold to MEPs following higher intensity D2 stimulation. As well, we assessed the effect of preceding D2 stimulation on MEPs recorded from a relaxed versus tonically contracted hand muscle. D2 stimulation elicited a triphasic response of modest MEP facilitation followed by inhibition and further facilitation. The duration and onset of MEP inhibition correlated with those of the initial period of rectified EMG inhibition, however, the magnitude of MEP inhibition was generally less than the magnitude of EMG inhibition, consistent with a greater inhibitory effect of digital afferents on smaller motor neurons. MEPs were not facilitated during the rebound of EMG activity (the E2 period) that usually followed the initial period of EMG inhibition (I1 period). The behavior of H-reflexes and F-responses following ipsilateral D2 stimulation suggested that inhibition of both EMG and MEPs is not mediated via presynaptic inhibition of Ia afferents, and that inhibition is augmented by descending rather than segmental input to spinal motor neurons. Tonic contraction of the target muscle during D2 stimulation decreased the inhibitory effect of the preceding digital stimulus possibly due to recruitment of larger spinal motor neurons less likely to be inhibited by cutaneous input.
我们检测了以4倍感觉阈值施加的一串短暂的指部(D2)电刺激对在D2刺激侧同侧的拇短展肌(APB)和桡侧腕屈肌(FCR)记录到的经颅磁运动诱发电位(MEP)的抑制作用。我们将此与同侧D2刺激对在最大自主收缩10%时记录的平均整流肌电图(EMG)以及对从这些相同肌肉记录到的F反应和H反射的抑制作用进行了比较。我们还比较了在略高于感觉阈值的D2刺激后记录的MEP与更高强度D2刺激后记录的MEP。此外,我们评估了先前的D2刺激对从放松的与强直性收缩的手部肌肉记录到的MEP的影响。D2刺激引发了MEP适度易化的三相反应,随后是抑制和进一步易化。MEP抑制的持续时间和起始与整流EMG抑制初始期的持续时间和起始相关,然而,MEP抑制的幅度通常小于EMG抑制的幅度,这与指传入纤维对较小运动神经元具有更大抑制作用一致。在通常跟随EMG抑制初始期(I1期)的EMG活动反弹期(E2期),MEP未出现易化。同侧D2刺激后H反射和F反应的表现表明,EMG和MEP的抑制不是通过Ia传入纤维的突触前抑制介导的,并且抑制是由下行而非节段性输入到脊髓运动神经元增强的。D2刺激期间目标肌肉的强直性收缩降低了先前指部刺激的抑制作用,这可能是由于募集了较不容易被皮肤输入抑制的较大脊髓运动神经元。