Hortobágyi Tibor, Taylor Janet L, Petersen Nicolas T, Russell Gabrielle, Gandevia Simon C
East Carolina University, Biomechanics Laboratory, Greenville, North Carolina 27858, USA.
J Neurophysiol. 2003 Oct;90(4):2451-9. doi: 10.1152/jn.01001.2002.
Motor or sensory activity in one arm can affect the other arm. We tested the hypothesis that a voluntary contraction can affect the motor pathway to the contralateral homologous muscle and investigated whether alterations in sensory input might mediate such effects. Responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation [motor-evoked potentials (MEPs)], stimulation of the descending tracts [cervicomedullary MEPs (CMEPs)], and peripheral nerve stimulation (H-reflex) were recorded from the relaxed right flexor carpi radialis (FCR), while the left arm underwent unilateral interventions (5 s duration) that included voluntary contraction, muscle contraction evoked through percutaneous stimulation, tendon vibration, and cutaneous and mixed nerve stimulation. During moderate to strong voluntary wrist flexion on the left, MEPs in the right FCR increased, CMEPs were unaffected, and the H-reflex was depressed. These results are consistent with an increase in excitability of the motor cortex, no effect on the motoneuron pool, and presynaptic inhibition of Ia afferents. In contrast, percutaneous muscle stimulation facilitated both MEPs and the H-reflex. However, muscle contraction produced by a combination of voluntary effort and electrical stimulation also reduced the contralateral H-reflex. After voluntary contractions, the H-reflex remained depressed for 35 s, but after stimulation-evoked contractions, it rapidly returned to baseline. Under both conditions, MEPs recovered rapidly. After voluntary contractions, CMEPs were also depressed for approximately 10 s despite their lack of change during contractions. Wrist tendon vibration (100 Hz) did not affect, and 20-Hz median nerve stimulation or forearm medial cutaneous nerve stimulation mildly facilitated, the H-reflex without affecting MEPs. Voluntary wrist extension, similarly to wrist flexion, increased MEPs and depressed H-reflexes. However, ankle dorsiflexion facilitated the H-reflex akin to the Jendrassik maneuver. These data suggest that a unilateral voluntary muscle contraction has contralateral effects at both cortical and segmental levels and that the segmental effects are not replicated by stimulated muscle contraction or by input from muscle spindles or non-nociceptive cutaneous afferents.
一侧手臂的运动或感觉活动会影响另一侧手臂。我们测试了这样一个假设,即自主收缩会影响到对侧同源肌肉的运动通路,并研究了感觉输入的改变是否可能介导这种影响。在右侧桡侧腕屈肌(FCR)放松时,记录其对经颅磁刺激[运动诱发电位(MEP)]、下行传导束刺激[颈髓运动诱发电位(CMEP)]以及外周神经刺激(H反射)的反应,同时左侧手臂接受单侧干预(持续5秒),干预包括自主收缩、经皮刺激诱发的肌肉收缩、肌腱振动以及皮肤和混合神经刺激。在左侧进行中度至强烈的自主腕部屈曲时,右侧FCR的MEP增加,CMEP未受影响,H反射受到抑制。这些结果与运动皮层兴奋性增加、对运动神经元池无影响以及Ia传入纤维的突触前抑制一致。相比之下,经皮肌肉刺激使MEP和H反射均增强。然而,自主努力和电刺激相结合产生的肌肉收缩也会降低对侧H反射。自主收缩后,H反射在35秒内仍受到抑制,但刺激诱发的收缩后,它迅速恢复到基线水平。在这两种情况下,MEP都迅速恢复。自主收缩后,尽管CMEP在收缩期间没有变化,但也会在大约10秒内受到抑制。腕部肌腱振动(100赫兹)未产生影响,20赫兹的正中神经刺激或前臂内侧皮神经刺激轻度增强了H反射,而未影响MEP。与腕部屈曲类似,自主腕部伸展增加了MEP并抑制了H反射。然而,踝关节背屈类似于Jendrassik动作,增强了H反射。这些数据表明,单侧自主肌肉收缩在皮层和节段水平均有对侧效应,且节段效应不会被刺激诱发的肌肉收缩或肌梭或非伤害性皮肤传入纤维的输入所复制。