Klieser E, Lehmann E, Kinzler E, Wurthmann C, Heinrich K
Psychiatric Department, Heinrich-Heine-University, Dusseldorf, Germany.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1995 Feb;15(1 Suppl 1):45S-51S. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199502001-00008.
This study compares the antipsychotic efficacy and the tolerability of risperidone and clozapine in patients with schizophrenia. Patients were randomized to double-blind treatment with risperidone, 4 mg (N = 20), risperidone, 8 mg (N = 19), or clozapine, 400 mg (N = 20), daily for 28 days. Efficacy was assessed by improvement of psychotic symptoms, measured on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, and Clinical Global Impression. The tolerability was assessed by the Simpson and Angus scale for extrapyramidal side effects (EPS), the Association for Methodology and Documentation in Psychiatry (AMDP) scale for somatic side effects, spontaneous reports of adverse events, clinical laboratory assessments, and vital signs. All treatments reduced psychotic symptoms. The global tolerability was significantly better in the risperidone than in the clozapine-treated patients (p < 0.01). There were no differences between treatments on the AMDP scale. The most frequent spontaneously reported adverse effects were dizziness, fatigue, accommodation disturbance, and EPS in all treatment groups and increased salivation, mainly in the clozapine-treated patients. Although there were no changes in vital signs during risperidone treatment, clozapine was associated with a mean reduction in heart rate of 10 beats/minute. Risperidone tolerability at endpoint was classified as "very good" by 60 and 47% of patients treated with risperidone, 4 and 8 mg daily, respectively; the corresponding figure in clozapine-treated patients was 30%. The results suggest that risperidone is at least as effective as an antipsychotic as clozapine, providing a valuable new approach for the treatment of schizophrenia.
本研究比较了利培酮和氯氮平对精神分裂症患者的抗精神病疗效及耐受性。患者被随机分为三组,分别接受双盲治疗,即每日服用4毫克利培酮(N = 20)、8毫克利培酮(N = 19)或400毫克氯氮平(N = 20),为期28天。通过简明精神病评定量表和临床总体印象量表评估精神病症状的改善情况来评定疗效。通过辛普森和安格斯锥体外系副作用量表、精神病学方法与文献协会(AMDP)躯体副作用量表、不良事件自发报告、临床实验室评估及生命体征来评估耐受性。所有治疗均减轻了精神病症状。利培酮治疗组的总体耐受性显著优于氯氮平治疗组(p < 0.01)。在AMDP量表上,各治疗组之间无差异。所有治疗组中最常自发报告的不良反应为头晕、疲劳、视力调节障碍和锥体外系副作用,而流涎增加主要见于氯氮平治疗组患者。虽然利培酮治疗期间生命体征无变化,但氯氮平使心率平均降低10次/分钟。分别接受每日4毫克和8毫克利培酮治疗的患者中,60%和47%在研究终点时将利培酮的耐受性评为“非常好”;氯氮平治疗组患者的这一比例为30%。结果表明,利培酮作为抗精神病药物至少与氯氮平一样有效,为精神分裂症的治疗提供了一种有价值的新方法。