• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

5%的谬误

The five per cent fallacy.

作者信息

Lesnoff-Caravaglia G

出版信息

Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1978;9(2):187-92. doi: 10.2190/5wjr-1jfb-fgag-mn9x.

DOI:10.2190/5wjr-1jfb-fgag-mn9x
PMID:753770
Abstract

Using the Kastenbaum and Candy study of locations where persons aged sixty-five plus died over the period of one year in a large metropolitan city as a model, this study examined the place of death for persons aged sixty-five plus in a middle-size city. In both studies particular attention was paid to nursing homes and extended care facilities to determine whether or not the commonly accepted figure of 5 per cent accurately reflects the number or persons actually living in such facilities. The premise was that if persons died in such a facility, then they had in fact lived there. This study demonstrates, as had the Kastenbaum and Candy study, that the actual percentage of persons dying in these institutions far exceeds the commonly held 5 per cent.

摘要

本研究以卡斯坦鲍姆和坎迪对一个大城市中65岁及以上老人在一年时间内死亡地点的研究为模型,调查了一个中等规模城市中65岁及以上老人的死亡地点。在这两项研究中,都特别关注了养老院和长期护理机构,以确定普遍认可的5%这一数字是否准确反映了实际居住在这类机构中的人数。前提是,如果有人在这类机构中死亡,那么他们实际上就居住在那里。正如卡斯坦鲍姆和坎迪的研究一样,本研究表明,在这些机构中死亡的实际人数比例远远超过了普遍认为的5%。

相似文献

1
The five per cent fallacy.5%的谬误
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1978;9(2):187-92. doi: 10.2190/5wjr-1jfb-fgag-mn9x.
2
[Life course and institutionalization: the deceptive effect of the percentage].
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 1982 Aug;13(4):139-46.
3
Urban growth and decline: San Jose and St. Louis in the 1960's.城市的兴衰:20世纪60年代的圣何塞和圣路易斯。
Science. 1974 Aug 30;185(4153):757-62. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4153.757.
4
Issues of institutionalization: five percent fallacies and terminal care.
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1983;17(1):43-55. doi: 10.2190/99QB-A8N4-CBVJ-YU87.
5
An evaluation of institutional care of the aged in South Africa.南非老年机构护理评估。
S Afr Med J. 1983 Aug 13;64(7):241-5.
6
[Old and new long stay patients in French psychiatric institutions: results from a national random survey with two-year follow-up].[法国精神病院的新老长期住院患者:一项为期两年随访的全国随机调查结果]
Encephale. 2005 Jul-Aug;31(4 Pt 1):466-76. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82408-x.
7
The experience of living-dying in a nursing home: self-reports of black and white older adults.养老院中的生死体验:黑人和白人老年人的自我报告。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998 Sep;46(9):1091-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb06646.x.
8
US trends in disability and institutionalization among older Blacks and Whites.美国老年黑人和白人的残疾与机构收容趋势。
Am J Public Health. 1997 Mar;87(3):438-40. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.3.438.
9
Factors leading to black elderly persons' decisions to seek institutional care in a home in the Eastern Cape.导致东开普省黑人老年人决定在养老院寻求机构护理的因素。
Curationis. 1996 Sep;19(3):47-50.
10
Changes in life and care in the year before death 1969-1987.1969年至1987年死亡前一年生活与护理的变化。
J Public Health Med. 1991 May;13(2):81-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Placement of the elderly.老年人安置。
Can Fam Physician. 1981 Oct;27:1589-91.