Suppr超能文献

粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)可使非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者接受有效剂量的CHOP和CVP方案治疗。

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) allows the delivery of effective doses of CHOP and CVP regimens in non-Hodgkin lymphomas.

作者信息

Silvestri F, Velisig M, Fanin R, Virgolini L, Zaja F, Barillari G, Baccarani M

机构信息

Department of Medical and Morphological Research, Udine University School of Medicine, Italy.

出版信息

Leuk Lymphoma. 1995 Feb;16(5-6):465-70. doi: 10.3109/10428199509054435.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the role and potential benefit of G-CSF administered following standard regimen chemotherapy (CHT) in non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Twenty patients with NHL were given CHOP or CHOP/CVP CHT every 21 days. None was given G-CSF after the first cycle. After each cycle, G-CSF was administered only for: 1) ANC < 1 x 10(9)/L between cycles; or 2) delay in cycle schedule due to ANC < 1 x 10(9)/L on the planned day of treatment; or 3) development of a febrile syndrome or a documented infection, regardless the ANC. Once administered, G-CSF was maintained in the following cycles. Nineteen patients required administration of G-CSF (5 micrograms/Kg B.W.), but for different reasons only 16 were treated (a mean of 10 +/- 3 doses/cycle). Comparing 48 cycles where G-CSF was not administered, with 50 where it was, in this last group we observed: 1) a ANC significantly higher at day 7 (p < 0.0001), day 14 (p < 0.0001) and day 21 (p = 0.0030); 2) a significantly lower (p = 0.0001) incidence of neutropenias (6 vs 29); 3) a trend (p = 0.1040) in favour of lower incidence of febrile neutropenias of infections (1 vs 6); 4) a significantly lower (p < 0.0001) incidence of cycle delays (1 vs 22) with a median of 8 days (1 to 20); and 5) a significantly higher (p < 0.0001) dose intensity (99.5% vs 87.8%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

本研究的目的是评估在非霍奇金淋巴瘤的标准方案化疗(CHT)后给予粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)的作用和潜在益处。20例非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者每21天接受CHOP或CHOP/CVP化疗。第一个周期后均未给予G-CSF。每个周期后,仅在以下情况给予G-CSF:1)周期之间中性粒细胞绝对值(ANC)<1×10⁹/L;或2)由于计划治疗日ANC<1×10⁹/L导致周期计划延迟;或3)出现发热综合征或有记录的感染,无论ANC水平如何。一旦给予,在随后的周期中持续使用G-CSF。19例患者需要给予G-CSF(5微克/千克体重),但由于不同原因仅16例接受了治疗(平均每周期10±3剂)。将未给予G-CSF的48个周期与给予G-CSF的50个周期进行比较,在最后一组中我们观察到:1)第7天(p<0.0001)、第14天(p<0.0001)和第21天(p=0.0030)时ANC显著更高;2)中性粒细胞减少症的发生率显著更低(p=0.0001)(6例 vs 29例);3)发热性中性粒细胞减少症感染发生率有降低趋势(p=0.1040)(1例 vs 6例);4)周期延迟的发生率显著更低(p<0.0001)(1例 vs 22例),中位延迟8天(1至20天);5)剂量强度显著更高(p<0.0001)(99.5% vs 87.8%)。(摘要截断于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验