Gerometta P, Antona C, Parolari A, Fratto P, Alamanni F, Spirito R, Arena V, Biglioli P
Fondazione I Monzino IRCCS, Cattedra di Cardiochirurgia I, Università degli Studi, Milano.
Minerva Cardioangiol. 1995 Jan-Feb;43(1-2):47-54.
Aprotinin effects on postoperative bleeding, redo operations due to excessive bleeding and postoperative blood products use have been retrospectively evaluated on a population of 894 consecutive patients operated upon between 1987 and 1991 for valvular surgery. In this period, aprotinin has been routinely used following the "High Dose" protocol starting from January 1990. To analyse results, all the patients considered (Group I) were divided into subgroups, following the heart valve operated upon, in "mitral" patients (391 patients, 43.7%, Group II), "aortic" patients (375 patients, 41.9%, Group III) and "mitro-aortic" patients (128 patients, 14.3%, Group IV). Each of these Groups has been subsequently split depending on whether or not they received aprotinin (Subgroups IA, IIA, IIIA, IVA with aprotinin, subgroups IB, IIB, IIIB, IVB without aprotinin). Considering the whole population (Group I), aprotinin determined a significant reduction of post-operative bleeding (499 +/- 634 ml Group IA versus 713 +/- 572 Group IB, p = 0.000), redo operations for bleeding (15/410, 3.7% Group IA versus 45/484, 9.3% Group IB, p = 0.0000) and consequently the percentage of patients exposed to blood products transfusion (37/410, 9% Group IA versus 163/484, 54.3% Group IB p = 0.0000). When the other Groups (II, III and IV) were considered, aprotinin determined a significant reduction of postoperative bleeding and of donor blood transfusions, while redo operations for bleeding, although less in total number, were not significantly reduced. Moreover, aprotinin has been effective in reducing postoperative blood losses, redo-operation for bleeding and blood use independently of the kind of oxygenator used: bubble vs hollow fibers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
对1987年至1991年间连续接受瓣膜手术的894例患者进行回顾性评估,以研究抑肽酶对术后出血、因出血过多进行的再次手术以及术后血液制品使用的影响。在此期间,从1990年1月起,抑肽酶按照“高剂量”方案常规使用。为分析结果,将所有纳入研究的患者(第一组)根据所置换的心脏瓣膜分为亚组,即“二尖瓣”患者(391例,43.7%,第二组)、“主动脉瓣”患者(375例,41.9%,第三组)和“二尖瓣 - 主动脉瓣”患者(128例,14.3%,第四组)。随后,每组又根据是否接受抑肽酶分为两组(接受抑肽酶的IA、IIA、IIIA、IVA亚组,未接受抑肽酶的IB、IIB、IIIB、IVB亚组)。就整个研究人群(第一组)而言,抑肽酶显著减少了术后出血(IA亚组499±634毫升,IB亚组713±572毫升,p = 0.000)、因出血进行的再次手术(IA亚组15/410,3.7%,IB亚组45/484,9.3%,p = 0.0000),进而降低了接受输血的患者百分比(IA亚组37/410,9%,IB亚组163/484,54.3%,p = 0.0000)。当考虑其他组(第二组、第三组和第四组)时,抑肽酶显著减少了术后出血和异体输血,而因出血进行的再次手术,尽管总数较少,但并未显著减少。此外,无论使用何种类型的氧合器(鼓泡式与中空纤维式),抑肽酶在减少术后失血、因出血进行的再次手术及血液使用方面均有效。(摘要截选至250词)