• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血清前列腺特异性抗原测定中的检测变异性。

Assay variability in serum prostate-specific antigen determination.

作者信息

Brawer M K, Daum P, Petteway J C, Wener M H

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle 98108, USA.

出版信息

Prostate. 1995 Jul;27(1):1-6. doi: 10.1002/pros.2990270102.

DOI:10.1002/pros.2990270102
PMID:7541527
Abstract

Consistency and reproducibility of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurement are essential in the application of this analyte to early detection or screening programs. In the present investigation, we sought to compare serum PSA levels determined by the IMx assay (Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL) and the Tandem E (Hybritech Inc., San Diego, CA) to determine whether there were differences. Two hundred twenty-eight random sera from our archival bank were investigated. One hundred-eight specimens were in the Tandem range of 2.0-10.0 ng/ml, and prostatic histology was known based on either systematic sector needle biopsy or transurethral resection. PSA was measured with three different lost of the IMx and Tandem assays. Over the entire range, there was a good correlation (r2 = 0.985); however, in the more useful clinical range of 2.0-10.0 ng/ml, the correlation was reduced to 0.923; in the 2.0-6.0 ng/ml range, it was further reduced to 0.852. The slope for the entire range was 0.948; however, in the 2.0- to 10.0-ng/ml range, it was 0.894; in the 2.0- to 6.0-ng/ml range, the slope was 0.815. Using PSA cutoffs of 4.0, 5.0, and 6.0 ng/ml, significant decrease in abnormal PSA values in men with cancer was observed with the IMx compared with Tandem. These data suggest that the IMx and the Tandem PSA assays are not equivalent, and in most patients a lower value is realized with the IMx assay. This bias appears to be greater in men with prostate cancer. Clinicians must be aware which assay their patients are being tested with, and laboratory technicians should run internal standards to ensure lack of significant intralot variability and consistency over time.

摘要

血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测结果的一致性和可重复性对于将该分析物应用于早期检测或筛查项目至关重要。在本研究中,我们试图比较由IMx检测法(雅培实验室,伊利诺伊州北芝加哥)和Tandem E检测法(Hybritech公司,加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥)测定的血清PSA水平,以确定两者是否存在差异。我们对存档库中的228份随机血清进行了研究。108份标本的Tandem检测值在2.0 - 10.0 ng/ml范围内,并且基于系统扇形针吸活检或经尿道切除术可知前列腺组织学情况。使用IMx和Tandem检测法的三种不同批次对PSA进行检测。在整个范围内,两者具有良好的相关性(r2 = 0.985);然而,在更具临床意义的2.0 - 10.0 ng/ml范围内,相关性降至0.923;在2.0 - 6.0 ng/ml范围内,进一步降至0.852。整个范围的斜率为0.948;然而,在2.0至10.0 ng/ml范围内,斜率为0.894;在2.0至6.0 ng/ml范围内,斜率为0.815。使用4.0、5.0和6.0 ng/ml的PSA临界值时,与Tandem检测法相比,IMx检测法观察到癌症男性患者中异常PSA值显著降低。这些数据表明IMx和Tandem PSA检测法并不等效,并且在大多数患者中,IMx检测法得出的值更低。这种偏差在前列腺癌男性患者中似乎更大。临床医生必须清楚其患者接受的是哪种检测法,并且实验室技术人员应运行内部标准以确保批内无显著变异性且随时间保持一致性。

相似文献

1
Assay variability in serum prostate-specific antigen determination.血清前列腺特异性抗原测定中的检测变异性。
Prostate. 1995 Jul;27(1):1-6. doi: 10.1002/pros.2990270102.
2
Diagnostic significance of prostate-specific antigen velocity at intermediate PSA serum levels in relation to the standard deviation of different test systems.
Urol Int. 1998;60(1):25-7. doi: 10.1159/000030198.
3
Comparison of three assays for total serum prostate-specific antigen and percentage of free prostate-specific antigen in predicting prostate histology.三种血清总前列腺特异性抗原及游离前列腺特异性抗原百分比检测方法在预测前列腺组织学方面的比较
Urology. 1996 Dec;48(6A Suppl):23-32. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(96)00606-1.
4
An analytical comparison of the three most commonly used prostate-specific antigen assays: Tandem-R, Tandem-E, and IMx.三种最常用的前列腺特异性抗原检测方法的分析比较:串联-R、串联-E和IMx。
Urology. 1995 Oct;46(4):524-32. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80266-0.
5
Some analytical considerations on the measurement of prostate-specific antigen.关于前列腺特异性抗原测量的一些分析考量
Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1996 Oct;34(10):817-21. doi: 10.1515/cclm.1996.34.10.817.
6
Reliability analysis of first and second generation PSA assays.
Can J Urol. 2000 Aug;7(4):1070-6.
7
The use of 'ultrasensitive' prostate-specific antigen assays in the detection of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.“超敏”前列腺特异性抗原检测法在根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发检测中的应用。
Br J Urol. 1996 Mar;77(3):418-22. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1996.91017.x.
8
Evaluation of the Abbott IMx automated immunoassay of prostate-specific antigen.雅培IMx全自动免疫分析法检测前列腺特异性抗原的评估
Clin Chem. 1992 Oct;38(10):2044-54.
9
Variation in measurement of prostate-specific antigen: importance of method and lot variability.前列腺特异性抗原测量的变异:方法和批次变异性的重要性。
Clin Chem. 1995 Dec;41(12 Pt 1):1730-7.
10
Measurement of serum prostate specific antigen using IMx prostate specific antigen assay.采用IMx前列腺特异性抗原检测法测定血清前列腺特异性抗原。
J Urol. 1994 Jan;151(1):94-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)34879-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: trust biology, not a number.理解前列腺癌根治术后的生化复发:相信生物学指标,而非单一数值。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023 Dec;26(4):637-638. doi: 10.1038/s41391-023-00646-6. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
2
Hospitalization decreases serum prostate-specific antigen values compared with outpatient values in patients with benign prostatic diseases.与门诊患者相比,良性前列腺疾病患者住院后的血清前列腺特异性抗原值降低。
Korean J Urol. 2013 Sep;54(9):593-7. doi: 10.4111/kju.2013.54.9.593. Epub 2013 Sep 10.
3
Optimizing prostate biopsy strategies for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
优化前列腺活检策略以诊断前列腺癌。
Rev Urol. 2003 Summer;5(3):149-55.
4
Complexed prostate-specific antigen improvement in detecting prostate cancer.复合前列腺特异性抗原在前列腺癌检测中的改善
Curr Urol Rep. 2001 Jun;2(3):253-8. doi: 10.1007/s11934-001-0088-7.