• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估医院姑息治疗团队的有效性。

Assessing the effectiveness of a hospital palliative care team.

作者信息

Ellershaw J E, Peat S J, Boys L C

机构信息

Pain Relief Research Unit, King's College Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Palliat Med. 1995 Apr;9(2):145-52. doi: 10.1177/026921639500900205.

DOI:10.1177/026921639500900205
PMID:7541684
Abstract

A prospective study was carried out of 125 hospital inpatients with malignant disease, referred to the King's College Hospital advisory palliative care team. A palliative care assessment (PACA) tool was developed in order to assess the outcome of interventions made within two weeks of referral with regard to: symptom control, change in the patients' and their relatives' insight regarding diagnosis and prognosis, and facilitation of patient placement. Reliability was assessed by cross-observer analysis, and validity by comparison with data obtained using the McCorckle symptom distress scale in a separate group of hospice inpatients. At initial assessment, the commonest symptom was pain, as reported by 74% of patients. One-third of the patients were unsure of their diagnosis and placement had not been decided in 61%. In total, the team undertook 245 pharmacological interventions for symptom control, 165 interventions regarding insight and 114 interventions concerning placement. Analysis of the data showed statistically significant improvements in pain (p < 0.001), nausea (p < 0.009), insomnia (p < 0.004), anorexia (p < 0.001) and constipation (p < 0.02). Discussion regarding diagnosis significantly changed the insight of patients (p < 0.001) and relatives (p < 0.02). Appropriate placement was assisted by interventions undertaken by the team. This study shows that a hospital palliative care team is effective at improving symptom control, facilitates understanding of the diagnosis and prognosis, and contributes to the appropriate placement of patients.

摘要

对125名患有恶性疾病的住院患者进行了一项前瞻性研究,这些患者被转诊至国王学院医院姑息治疗咨询团队。开发了一种姑息治疗评估(PACA)工具,以评估转诊后两周内进行的干预措施在以下方面的效果:症状控制、患者及其亲属对诊断和预后的认知变化,以及促进患者安置。通过交叉观察者分析评估可靠性,并与另一组临终关怀住院患者使用麦科克尔症状困扰量表获得的数据进行比较来评估有效性。在初始评估时,最常见的症状是疼痛,74%的患者报告有疼痛。三分之一的患者不确定自己的诊断,61%的患者安置问题尚未确定。该团队总共进行了245次症状控制的药物干预、165次关于认知的干预和114次关于安置的干预。数据分析显示,疼痛(p < 0.001)、恶心(p < 0.009)、失眠(p < 0.004)、厌食(p < 0.001)和便秘(p < 0.02)有统计学上的显著改善。关于诊断的讨论显著改变了患者(p < 0.001)和亲属(p < 0.02)的认知。该团队进行的干预有助于患者得到适当安置。这项研究表明,医院姑息治疗团队在改善症状控制、促进对诊断和预后的理解以及帮助患者得到适当安置方面是有效的。

相似文献

1
Assessing the effectiveness of a hospital palliative care team.评估医院姑息治疗团队的有效性。
Palliat Med. 1995 Apr;9(2):145-52. doi: 10.1177/026921639500900205.
2
Improving cancer patients' pain: the impact of the hospital specialist palliative care team.改善癌症患者的疼痛状况:医院专科姑息治疗团队的影响
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2006 Dec;15(5):476-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2006.00690.x.
3
Do hospital palliative care teams improve symptom control? Use of a modified STAS as an evaluation tool.医院姑息治疗团队能否改善症状控制?使用改良的STAS作为评估工具。
Palliat Med. 1998 Sep;12(5):345-51. doi: 10.1191/026921698677822456.
4
Phase II study of an outpatient palliative care intervention in patients with metastatic cancer.转移性癌症患者门诊姑息治疗干预的II期研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jan 10;27(2):206-13. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.7568. Epub 2008 Dec 8.
5
Hospital based palliative care teams improve the insight of cancer patients into their disease.以医院为基础的姑息治疗团队可提高癌症患者对自身疾病的认知。
Palliat Med. 2004 Jan;18(1):46-52. doi: 10.1191/0268216304pm846oa.
6
Effects of the hospital-based palliative care team on the care for cancer patients: an evaluation study.基于医院的姑息治疗团队对癌症患者护理的影响:一项评估研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Feb;51(2):226-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.05.008. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
7
Palliative care team: the first year audit in Japan.姑息治疗团队:日本的第一年审计
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005 May;29(5):458-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2004.08.013.
8
[Symptoms seen in inpatient palliative care and impact of palliative care unit on symptom control].[住院姑息治疗中出现的症状及姑息治疗单元对症状控制的影响]
Agri. 2015;27(2):104-10. doi: 10.5505/agri.2015.26214.
9
Preliminary report of the integration of a palliative care team into an intensive care unit.重症监护病房姑息治疗团队整合的初步报告。
Palliat Med. 2010 Mar;24(2):154-65. doi: 10.1177/0269216309346540. Epub 2009 Oct 13.
10
Impact of a palliative care consultation team on cancer-related symptoms in advanced cancer patients referred to an outpatient supportive care clinic.姑息治疗咨询团队对转诊至门诊支持性护理诊所的晚期癌症患者癌症相关症状的影响。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Jan;41(1):49-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.03.017. Epub 2010 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

1
POMSNAME: an aide-mémoire to improve the assessment and documentation of palliative care - a longitudinal project.POMSNAME:改善姑息治疗评估和记录的辅助记忆工具 - 一项纵向研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Oct 21;22(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01279-1.
2
Nausea at the start of specialized palliative care and change in nausea after the first weeks of palliative care were associated with cancer site, gender, and type of palliative care service-a nationwide study.在接受专科姑息治疗之初出现恶心症状,以及在姑息治疗开始后的第一周内恶心症状发生变化,与癌症部位、性别和姑息治疗服务类型有关——一项全国性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Nov;30(11):9471-9482. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07310-0. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
3
Baseline measures of primary health care team functioning and overall primary health care performance at Du Noon Community Health Centre.
杜农社区健康中心初级卫生保健团队运作及总体初级卫生保健绩效的基线测量。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2018 Sep 5;10(1):e1-e11. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v10i1.1458.
4
Awareness and Misperceptions of Hospice and Palliative Care: A Population-Based Survey Study.临终关怀与姑息治疗的认知与误解:一项基于人群的调查研究。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Mar;35(3):431-439. doi: 10.1177/1049909117715215. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
5
Multicomponent Palliative Care Interventions in Advanced Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review.晚期慢性病的多组分姑息治疗干预措施:一项系统评价
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Jan;35(1):173-183. doi: 10.1177/1049909116674669. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
6
A new palliative care consultation team at the oncology department of a university hospital: an assessment of initial efficiency and effectiveness.大学附属医院肿瘤科新设立的姑息治疗咨询团队:初步效率和效果评估。
Support Care Cancer. 2012 Sep;20(9):2199-203. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1476-x. Epub 2012 May 3.
7
Lung cancer physicians' referral practices for palliative care consultation.肺癌医生对姑息治疗咨询的转诊实践。
Ann Oncol. 2012 Feb;23(2):382-7. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr345. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
8
Collaboration between physicians and a hospital-based palliative care team in a general acute-care hospital in Japan.日本一家综合急性护理医院的医生与医院姑息治疗团队之间的合作。
BMC Palliat Care. 2010 Jun 15;9:13. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-9-13.
9
Impact of a new palliative care consultation team on opioid prescription in a University Hospital.一个新的姑息治疗会诊团队对一所大学医院阿片类药物处方的影响。
BMC Palliat Care. 2009 Jan 16;8:2. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-8-2.
10
Perceptions and utilization of palliative care services in acute care hospitals.急性护理医院中姑息治疗服务的认知与利用情况
J Palliat Med. 2007 Feb;10(1):99-110. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2006.0155.