• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经尿道微波热疗治疗良性前列腺增生:1年随访后的临床结果

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: clinical results after a 1-year follow-up.

作者信息

Terai A, Arai Y, Onishi H, Oishi K, Takeuchi H, Yoshida O

机构信息

Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Urol. 1995 Mar;2(1):24-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.1995.tb00615.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1442-2042.1995.tb00615.x
PMID:7542159
Abstract

Since September 1992, 63 patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) have been treated with transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) using the Prostatron device. The International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) and quality of life (QOL) score were used to evaluate subjective symptoms. The mean I-PSS (total, irritative and obstructive scores) and QOL scores had decreased by 40, 38, 45 and 40%, respectively, at 12 months (p < 0.0001). While the mean peak flow rate had increased by 72% (p < 0.001). The clinical efficacy at 12 months was 42%, using a modification of the response criteria proposed at the 2nd International Consultation on Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. There were no significant differences in the baseline and treatment parameters between those who responded favorably to TUMT and those who did not. The total thermal dose delivered to the prostate did not predict clinical response. However, there was a positive correlation between I-PSS or QOL at baseline and % reduction at 3, 6 and 12 months, and a negative correlation between peak flow rate at baseline and % increase at 3 and 6 months. There were no major complications associated with TUMT during the follow-up period. In summary, our 1-year clinical results are compatible with previous reports, suggesting that TUMT is a safe, effective and lasting non-surgical treatment for BPH. However, evaluation of efficacy should be based on uniform criteria to facilitate comparisons of different clinical trials. The most suitable patient profiles for TUMT could not be identified by retrospective analysis.

摘要

自1992年9月以来,63例有症状的良性前列腺增生(BPH)患者使用Prostatron设备接受了经尿道微波热疗(TUMT)。采用国际前列腺症状评分(I-PSS)和生活质量(QOL)评分来评估主观症状。在12个月时,平均I-PSS(总分、刺激性症状评分和梗阻性症状评分)和QOL评分分别下降了40%、38%、45%和40%(p<0.0001)。而平均最大尿流率增加了72%(p<0.001)。根据第二届良性前列腺增生国际咨询会议提出的反应标准进行修改后,12个月时的临床有效率为42%。对TUMT反应良好者和反应不佳者在基线和治疗参数方面无显著差异。输送到前列腺的总热剂量并不能预测临床反应。然而,基线时的I-PSS或QOL与3个月、6个月和12个月时的降低百分比呈正相关,基线时的最大尿流率与3个月和6个月时的增加百分比呈负相关。随访期间未发生与TUMT相关的重大并发症。总之,我们的1年临床结果与先前的报告一致,表明TUMT是一种安全、有效且持久的BPH非手术治疗方法。然而,疗效评估应基于统一标准,以方便不同临床试验之间的比较。通过回顾性分析无法确定最适合TUMT的患者特征。

相似文献

1
Transurethral microwave thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: clinical results after a 1-year follow-up.经尿道微波热疗治疗良性前列腺增生:1年随访后的临床结果
Int J Urol. 1995 Mar;2(1):24-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.1995.tb00615.x.
2
Microwave thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia.良性前列腺增生的微波热疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12(9):CD004135. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004135.pub3.
3
Microwave thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia.微波热疗治疗良性前列腺增生症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17(4):CD004135. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004135.pub2.
4
[Transurethral microwave thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: clinical evaluation with International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS)].
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1993 Nov;39(11):1003-9.
5
Microwave thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia with the Dornier Urowave: response durability and variables potentially predicting response.使用多尼尔微波进行良性前列腺增生的微波热疗:反应持久性及可能预测反应的变量
Urology. 2001 Apr;57(4):701-5; discussion 705-6. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)01118-3.
6
Temporary intraurethral prostatic bridge-catheter compared with neoadjuvant and adjuvant alpha-blockade to improve early results of high-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy.暂时性尿道内前列腺桥接导管与新辅助及辅助性α受体阻滞剂对比以改善高能经尿道微波热疗的早期效果
Urology. 1999 Jul;54(1):73-80. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00029-1.
7
Urodynamic changes in benign prostatic hyperplasia patients treated by transurethral microwave thermotherapy.经尿道微波热疗治疗良性前列腺增生患者的尿动力学变化
Eur Urol. 1994;26(4):303-8. doi: 10.1159/000475404.
8
Transurethral microwave thermotherapy for management of benign prostatic hyperplasia: durability of response.经尿道微波热疗治疗良性前列腺增生:疗效的持久性
Urology. 1996 May;47(5):664-71. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(96)00012-x.
9
Transurethral microwave thermotherapy of the prostate without intravenous sedation: results of a single United States center using both low- and high-energy protocols. TJUH TUMT Study Group.无静脉镇静下经尿道前列腺微波热疗:美国一个中心采用低能量和高能量方案的结果。TJUH经尿道前列腺微波热疗研究组
Tech Urol. 2000 Dec;6(4):282-7.
10
Transurethral microwave thermotherapy (Prostatron version 2.5) compared with transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized, controlled, parallel study.经尿道微波热疗(Prostatron 2.5版本)与经尿道前列腺切除术治疗良性前列腺增生的比较:一项随机、对照、平行研究。
Br J Urol. 1997 Feb;79(2):181-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1997.02667.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Transurethral microwave thermotherapy in benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Curr Urol Rep. 2000 Aug;1(2):110-5. doi: 10.1007/s11934-000-0045-x.