Beattie E, Paoletti E, Tartaglia J
Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Public Health, University at Albany, New York 12222, USA.
Virology. 1995 Jul 10;210(2):254-63. doi: 10.1006/viro.1995.1342.
Recent results have implicated a role for both the VV K3L- and E3L-encoded gene products in conferring VV with an IFN-resistant phenotype (Beattie et al., Virology 183, 419-422, 1991; Beattie et al., J. Virol. 69, 499-505, 1995). As a means of further establishing the mechanisms by which these functions mediate this process in VV-infected cells, we have further assessed the IFN phenotype in K3L- (vP872) and E3L- (vP1080) virus-infected cells. Biochemical and molecular biological analyses were performed comparing the effects of IFN on wild-type as well as K3L- and E3L- virus-infected cells. Expression analyses of the K3L and E3L gene products revealed that both are evidenced in virus-infected cells as early as 0.5 hr postinfection. E3L expression, however, appears more prolonged, in that it was detectable between 3 to 4 hr postinfection while K3L was undetectable after 3 hr postinfection. Despite having similar expression profiles at early times postinfection, a pronounced sensitivity of protein synthesis to IFN was observed by 30 min postinfection in VV K3L- virus-infected cells, whereas IFN sensitivity was not observed in VV E3L(-)-infected cells until 2 hr postinfection. Subsequent analyses of the IFN-induced antiviral pathways in VV-infected cells demonstrated that the K3L gene product does not contribute to the previously identified specific kinase inhibitory factor (SKIF) activity but does reduce the level of phosphorylated eIF-2 alpha in VV-infected cells. Interestingly, the IFN-induced 2',5'-oligoadenylate synthetase-mediated antiviral pathway was active in VV K3L(-)-infected cells and not in wild-type virus-infected cells. Collectively these results suggest that the K3L(-)- and E3L(-)-encoded products abrogate the antiviral effect of IFN at distinct levels.
最近的研究结果表明,痘苗病毒(VV)K3L基因和E3L基因编码的产物在赋予VV干扰素抗性表型方面发挥了作用(Beattie等人,《病毒学》183卷,419 - 422页,1991年;Beattie等人,《病毒学杂志》69卷,499 - 505页,1995年)。为了进一步确定这些功能在痘苗病毒感染细胞中介导这一过程的机制,我们进一步评估了K3L基因(vP872)和E3L基因(vP1080)病毒感染细胞中的干扰素表型。进行了生化和分子生物学分析,比较了干扰素对野生型以及K3L基因和E3L基因病毒感染细胞的影响。K3L基因和E3L基因产物的表达分析表明,早在感染后0.5小时,两者在病毒感染细胞中就有表达。然而,E3L的表达似乎持续时间更长,在感染后3至4小时可检测到,而K3L在感染后3小时后就检测不到了。尽管在感染后早期具有相似的表达模式,但在痘苗病毒K3L基因病毒感染细胞中,感染后30分钟就观察到蛋白质合成对干扰素具有明显的敏感性,而在痘苗病毒E3L基因(-)感染细胞中,直到感染后2小时才观察到对干扰素的敏感性。随后对痘苗病毒感染细胞中干扰素诱导的抗病毒途径的分析表明,K3L基因产物对先前确定的特异性激酶抑制因子(SKIF)活性没有贡献,但确实降低了痘苗病毒感染细胞中磷酸化eIF - 2α的水平。有趣的是,干扰素诱导的2',5'-寡腺苷酸合成酶介导的抗病毒途径在痘苗病毒K3L基因(-)感染细胞中活跃,而在野生型病毒感染细胞中不活跃。这些结果共同表明,K3L基因(-)和E3L基因(-)编码的产物在不同水平上消除了干扰素的抗病毒作用。