Davies M V, Chang H W, Jacobs B L, Kaufman R J
Genetics Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02140.
J Virol. 1993 Mar;67(3):1688-92. doi: 10.1128/JVI.67.3.1688-1692.1993.
Vaccinia virus has evolved multiple mechanisms to counteract the interferon-induced antiviral host cell response. Recently, two vaccinia virus gene products were shown to interfere with the activity of the double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase (PKR): the K3L gene product and the E3L gene product. We have evaluated the efficiency by which these gene products inhibit PKR and whether they act in a synergistic manner. The effects of the two vaccinia virus gene products were compared in an in vivo system in which translation of a reporter gene (dihydrofolate reductase or eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 alpha [eIF-2 alpha]) was inhibited because of the localized activation of PKR. In this system, the E3L gene product, and to a lesser extent the K3L gene product, potentiated translation of the reporter gene and inhibited eIF-2 alpha phosphorylation. Analysis in vitro demonstrated that the E3L gene product inhibited PKR approximately 50- to 100-fold more efficiently than the K3L gene product. However, further studies demonstrated that the mechanism of action of these two inhibitors was different. Whereas the E3L inhibitor interfered with the binding of the kinase to double-stranded RNA, the K3L inhibitor did not. We propose that the K3L inhibitor acts through its homology to eIF-2 alpha to interfere with the interaction of eIF-2 alpha with PKR. The two inhibitors did not display a synergistic effect on translation or eIF-2 alpha phosphorylation. In addition, neither K3L nor E3L expression detectably altered cellular protein synthesis.
痘苗病毒已进化出多种机制来对抗干扰素诱导的抗病毒宿主细胞反应。最近,两种痘苗病毒基因产物被证明可干扰双链RNA依赖性蛋白激酶(PKR)的活性:K3L基因产物和E3L基因产物。我们评估了这些基因产物抑制PKR的效率以及它们是否以协同方式发挥作用。在一个体内系统中比较了这两种痘苗病毒基因产物的作用效果,在该系统中,由于PKR的局部激活,报告基因(二氢叶酸还原酶或真核翻译起始因子2α [eIF-2α])的翻译受到抑制。在这个系统中,E3L基因产物,以及程度较轻的K3L基因产物,增强了报告基因的翻译并抑制了eIF-2α的磷酸化。体外分析表明,E3L基因产物抑制PKR的效率比K3L基因产物高约50至100倍。然而,进一步的研究表明这两种抑制剂的作用机制不同。E3L抑制剂干扰激酶与双链RNA的结合,而K3L抑制剂则不然。我们提出K3L抑制剂通过其与eIF-2α的同源性来干扰eIF-2α与PKR的相互作用。这两种抑制剂在翻译或eIF-2α磷酸化方面没有显示出协同作用。此外,K3L和E3L的表达均未检测到对细胞蛋白质合成的明显改变。