Holmes F A
Department of Breast and Gynecologic Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston 77030, USA.
Semin Oncol. 1995 Aug;22(4 Suppl 8):9-15.
The first of three trials at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center investigating paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) in metastatic breast cancer was a phase II study involving 25 patients (297 courses) previously treated with only one chemotherapy regimen; the patients received paclitaxel 250 mg/m2 infused over 24 hours without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Complete (12%) and partial responses (44%) led to median durations of response and survival of 9 and 21 months, respectively. The median paclitaxel dose was 200 mg/m2. Despite profound neutropenia (median granulocyte count of 0.3 cells x 10(9)/L for the first three courses), infection occurred in 42% of patients but only 6% of courses. In a phase I trial of paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 over 24 hours followed by doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 using G-CSF at 5 micrograms/kg days 5 through 19, dose-limiting mucositis with neutropenic fever occurred at the starting dose, so the maximum tolerated dose was one dose lower: paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 (over 24 hours) followed by doxorubicin 48 mg/m2 over 48 hours. Among 10 patients, there was one complete response and seven partial responses (overall response, 80%). Suspecting a schedule-dependent interaction between drugs, a phase I trial of the reverse sequence yielded a maximum tolerated dose, defined by neutropenic fever without mucositis, of doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 (over 48 hours) followed by paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 (over 24 hours) in 21 patients. A pharmacokinetic study in which the sequence of administration of paclitaxel over 24 hours and doxorubicin over 48 hours was alternated in courses 1 and 2 indicated that when paclitaxel by 24-hour infusion is given first, doxorubicin plasma levels at the end of infusion were an average 70% higher and doxorubicin clearance was reduced approximately 30% compared with the reverse sequence. Similarly, the incidence of grade 2 or 3 mucositis was 70% with the paclitaxel/doxorubicin sequence versus only 10% with the reverse sequence. We concluded that paclitaxel slows doxorubicin metabolism and that when used together in this schedule, doxorubicin should precede paclitaxel. In the third trial paclitaxel without G-CSF was administered to two groups of heavily pretreated patients: (1) those with only two prior chemotherapy regimens (inclusive of adjuvant therapy) received paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 over 24 hours and (2) those with three or more prior regimens received paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 over 24 hours. Response rates in both regimens were approximately 20%. We conclude that paclitaxel has significant antitumor activity in metastatic breast cancer, especially in patients with limited prior therapy, without need for G-CSF.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
在MD安德森癌症中心开展的三项转移性乳腺癌紫杉醇(泰素;百时美施贵宝公司,新泽西州普林斯顿)试验中的第一项是一项II期研究,涉及25例患者(297个疗程),这些患者此前仅接受过一种化疗方案的治疗;患者接受250mg/m²的紫杉醇在24小时内输注,未使用粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)。完全缓解率(12%)和部分缓解率(44%)分别导致缓解持续时间和生存时间的中位数为9个月和21个月。紫杉醇剂量的中位数为200mg/m²。尽管有严重的中性粒细胞减少(前三个疗程中性粒细胞计数的中位数为0.3×10⁹/L), 42%的患者发生了感染,但仅6%的疗程出现感染。在一项I期试验中,先在24小时内给予125mg/m²的紫杉醇,随后在第5至19天给予60mg/m²的阿霉素,并使用5μg/kg的G-CSF,在起始剂量时出现了剂量限制性粘膜炎伴中性粒细胞减少性发热, 因此最大耐受剂量降低一级: 在24小时内给予125mg/m²的紫杉醇,随后在48小时内给予48mg/m²的阿霉素。10例患者中,有1例完全缓解,7例部分缓解(总缓解率80%)。由于怀疑药物之间存在时间依赖性相互作用,对相反给药顺序进行了一项I期试验,在21例患者中确定了由无粘膜炎的中性粒细胞减少性发热定义的最大耐受剂量,即先在48小时内给予60mg/m²的阿霉素,随后在24小时内给予150mg/m²的紫杉醇。一项药代动力学研究,在第1和第2疗程中交替给予24小时输注的紫杉醇和48小时输注的阿霉素,结果表明,当先给予24小时输注的紫杉醇时,输注结束时阿霉素的血浆水平平均高出70%,与相反给药顺序相比,阿霉素清除率降低约30%。同样,紫杉醇/阿霉素给药顺序时2或3级粘膜炎的发生率为70%,而相反给药顺序时仅为10%。我们得出结论,紫杉醇会减缓阿霉素的代谢,当按此给药方案联合使用时,阿霉素应先于紫杉醇给药。在第三项试验中, 将未使用G-CSF的紫杉醇给予两组经过大量预处理的患者: (1)那些仅接受过两种先前化疗方案(包括辅助治疗)的患者在24小时内接受175mg/m²的紫杉醇,(2)那些接受过三种或更多先前方案的患者在24小时内接受150mg/m²的紫杉醇。两种方案的缓解率均约为20%。我们得出结论,紫杉醇在转移性乳腺癌中具有显著的抗肿瘤活性,尤其是在先前治疗有限的患者中,无需使用G-CSF。(摘要截短至400字)