Chia K S, Jeyaratnam J, Lee J, Tan C, Ong H Y, Ong C N, Lee E
Department of Community, Occupational and Family Medicine, National University of Singapore.
Am J Ind Med. 1995 Jun;27(6):883-95. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700270612.
Lead nephropathy in adults is silent and insidious, characterized by the absence of proteinuria in its early phase. Of the early markers of nephrotoxicity, urinary N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase (NAG) appears to be the only one that is elevated in early lead nephropathy. However, the elevation in urinary NAG activity may be a response to a sharp increase in renal burden of lead. Its usefulness as a marker of chronic lead nephropathy is thus in doubt. There is a need, then, to identify a reliable early biological indicator of lead-induced kidney damage. Furthermore, there is also a need to identify suitable markers of chronic exposure to describe meaningful dose-response and dose-effect relationships. Traditionally, blood lead (PbB) was used, but the current blood lead level (PbBrec) is more an indicator of recent exposure. Time-integrated blood lead indices (PbBint) derived from repeated serial PbB measurements can be used as indices of chronic exposure. In 128 lead-exposed workers, the PbBint was the most important exposure variable in describing the variability in urinary alpha 1-microglobulin (U alpha 1 m), urinary beta 2-microglobulin (U beta 2m), and urinary retinol binding protein (URBP). U alpha 1m was the only marker that was significantly higher in the exposed group, with a good dose-response and dose-effect relationship with PbBint. The lack of dose-response and dose-effect relationships in other studies may be due to inappropriate exposure markers as well as less sensitive response markers. PbBint has a better correlation than PbBrec. Furthermore, U alpha 1m may be the most sensitive of the markers because of its higher molecular weight.
