Quatela V C, Sherris D A, Rounds M F
Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, NY, USA.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995 Oct;121(10):1106-13. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1995.01890100022004.
To identify refinements in forehead flap nasal reconstruction that consistently provide better esthetic and functional results.
Case series of patients undergoing forehead flap nasal reconstruction from July 1, 1987, to May 31, 1994.
University hospital ambulatory surgery department.
Thirty-two patients with various nasal defects.
Modifications of currently accepted techniques of paramedian forehead flap nasal reconstruction, namely, flap harvest and contouring, W-plasty closure of the superior forehead donor site, and creation of soft-tissue triangles. The principles of open-structure rhinoplasty are incorporated into cartilaginous reconstruction of the nasal tip and columella. The alar rim is reconstructed with cartilage grafts placed at the nasal rim.
Esthetic and functional results of nasal reconstruction were subjectively graded by three otolaryngologists (V.C.Q., D.A.S., and M.F.R.) and the patients.
Improved esthetic and functional nasal reconstruction. The most common nasal subunits reconstructed were as follows: ala, 27 patients (84%); side-wall, 22 patients (69%); dorsum, 18 patients (56%), and tip, 15 patients (47%). The esthetic results ranged from average to excellent (3 to 5 on a scale of 5), the functional results ranged from improved to much improved over preoperative breathing (4 to 5). Two patients required unplanned surgical revisions. Forty-seven percent of patients chose to undergo dermabrasion. Five patients required postoperative intradermal injection of triamcinolone acetonide (Kenalog). Three patients required preoperative tissue expansion. Flap or graft loss, infection, or hematoma did not occur.
The predictability of the techniques in providing excellent results in patients undergoing nasal reconstruction decreases the need for revision procedures and helps the patient and the surgeon achieve the desired outcome.
确定前额皮瓣鼻再造术中能持续带来更好美学和功能效果的改进方法。
1987年7月1日至1994年5月31日接受前额皮瓣鼻再造术患者的病例系列。
大学医院门诊手术科室。
32例有各种鼻缺损的患者。
对目前公认的正中旁前额皮瓣鼻再造技术进行改良,即皮瓣切取与塑形、前额供区上方W形缝合以及软组织三角的创建。开放式鼻整形术的原则被纳入鼻尖和鼻小柱的软骨重建。鼻翼缘用置于鼻缘的软骨移植物重建。
由三位耳鼻喉科医生(V.C.Q.、D.A.S.和M.F.R.)和患者对鼻再造的美学和功能效果进行主观评分。
鼻再造的美学和功能得到改善。最常重建的鼻亚单位如下:鼻翼,27例(84%);鼻侧壁,22例(69%);鼻背,18例(56%),鼻尖,15例(47%)。美学效果从一般到优秀(5分制中为3至5分),功能效果较术前呼吸改善至明显改善(4至5分)。2例患者需要进行计划外的手术修复。47%的患者选择进行磨皮术。5例患者术后需要皮内注射曲安奈德(康宁克通)。3例患者术前需要进行组织扩张。未发生皮瓣或移植物丢失、感染或血肿。
这些技术在鼻再造患者中取得优异效果的可预测性降低了修复手术的必要性,并有助于患者和外科医生实现预期效果。