Gardner M, Rosenthal A, Jennings M, Yee J, Antipa L, Robinson E
Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of California at Davis 95616, USA.
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 1995 Jul;11(7):843-54. doi: 10.1089/aid.1995.11.843.
To evaluate the role of humoral immunity against simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV), we tested whether passive immunization with plasma from SIVmac251 vaccine-protected or healthy infected animals would protect rhesus monkeys against intravenous infection with ten 50% animal infectious doses of the cell-free homologous virus. The challenge dose of this SIVmac251 virus stock had previously caused persistent infection in all (21 of 21) nonimmunized controls. A plasma pool was obtained from a donor that had been immunized with an inactivated whole SIVmac251 vaccine produced in human T cells. This plasma pool contained low levels of SIVmac binding and neutralizing antibody but had a high titer of antibodies recognizing human cell proteins. Given 4 or 18 hr before intravenous challenge, this plasma completely protected three of eight recipients from infection and delayed virus detection in one recipient. The five unprotected animals had only a transient or undetectable p27 antigenemia and low virus load in their PBMCs, and all survived at least 7 months after infection. By contrast, no protection was observed in 6 monkeys given inactivated, pooled plasma or purified immunoglobulin (Ig) from healthy SIVmac251-infected animals. This plasma pool and the Ig preparation contained high levels of SIV-binding and neutralizing antibody but no reactivity to human cellular components. Five of the six recipients had persistent antigenemia after challenge and four died acutely from simian AIDS in 4-7 months. These studies suggest that passive transfer of antibody to human cellular antigens can confer protection against SIVmac whereas passive transfer of neutralizing antibodies without human cellular antibodies does not protect against the homologous virus and may enhance infection.
为了评估体液免疫在抗猴免疫缺陷病毒(SIV)中的作用,我们测试了用来自SIVmac251疫苗保护的或健康感染动物的血浆进行被动免疫,是否能保护恒河猴免受静脉注射10个50%动物感染剂量的无细胞同源病毒的感染。这种SIVmac251病毒毒株的攻击剂量此前已在所有(21只中的21只)未免疫的对照动物中引起持续感染。从一名用在人T细胞中生产的灭活全SIVmac251疫苗免疫的供体获得了一个血浆池。这个血浆池含有低水平的SIVmac结合抗体和中和抗体,但具有高滴度的识别人类细胞蛋白的抗体。在静脉注射攻击前4小时或18小时给予这种血浆,它完全保护了8只受体中的3只免受感染,并在1只受体中延迟了病毒检测。5只未受保护的动物在其外周血单核细胞中只有短暂的或不可检测的p27抗原血症和低病毒载量,并且所有动物在感染后至少存活了7个月。相比之下,在6只给予来自健康SIVmac251感染动物的灭活合并血浆或纯化免疫球蛋白(Ig)的猴子中未观察到保护作用。这个血浆池和Ig制剂含有高水平的SIV结合抗体和中和抗体,但对人类细胞成分无反应性。6只受体中的5只在攻击后有持续的抗原血症,4只在4 - 7个月内死于猴艾滋病。这些研究表明,将针对人类细胞抗原的抗体进行被动转移可提供针对SIVmac的保护,而没有人类细胞抗体的中和抗体的被动转移不能保护免受同源病毒感染,并且可能增强感染。