• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童对牙科注射和治疗疼痛的评级,以及注射所用时间的影响。

Children's ratings of dental injection and treatment pain, and the influence of the time taken to administer the injection.

作者信息

Jones C M, Heidmann J, Gerrish A C

机构信息

Department of Dental Public Health, West Pennine Health Authority, England.

出版信息

Int J Paediatr Dent. 1995 Jun;5(2):81-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263x.1995.tb00169.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-263x.1995.tb00169.x
PMID:7547818
Abstract

Three hundred and eight children aged 3-16 years (mean age 10.2), who were undergoing routine dental treatment, recorded on visual analogue scales their ratings of pain associated with injection and treatment. The injection pain scores were examined for their relationship to age, gender, time taken to administer the injection and injection type. The treatment pain scores were compared between groups who had teeth either extracted or restored, and between groups assessed by the operator as having total or partial anaesthesia. A significant inverse correlation was found between subjective injection pain and injection duration. The difference in treatment pain scores was significant between groups assessed by the operator as having total or partial anaesthesia. Inferior dental nerve blocks were rated significantly more painful than buccal infiltrations. Age, gender, and the operative procedure performed had no statistically significant relationship to the injection pain scores or treatment pain scores. The visual analogue pain scale was found to be unsuitable for use by children under 7 years of age.

摘要

308名年龄在3至16岁(平均年龄10.2岁)、正在接受常规牙科治疗的儿童,用视觉模拟量表记录了他们与注射及治疗相关的疼痛评分。对注射疼痛评分进行了检查,以确定其与年龄、性别、注射所用时间及注射类型之间的关系。比较了拔牙组和补牙组之间以及被操作者评估为完全麻醉或部分麻醉组之间的治疗疼痛评分。发现主观注射疼痛与注射持续时间之间存在显著的负相关。被操作者评估为完全麻醉或部分麻醉组之间的治疗疼痛评分差异显著。下牙槽神经阻滞的疼痛评分显著高于颊部浸润。年龄、性别及所进行的手术操作与注射疼痛评分或治疗疼痛评分无统计学上的显著关系。发现视觉模拟疼痛量表不适用于7岁以下儿童。

相似文献

1
Children's ratings of dental injection and treatment pain, and the influence of the time taken to administer the injection.儿童对牙科注射和治疗疼痛的评级,以及注射所用时间的影响。
Int J Paediatr Dent. 1995 Jun;5(2):81-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263x.1995.tb00169.x.
2
Evaluation of 2-Stage Injection Technique in Children.儿童两阶段注射技术的评估
Anesth Prog. 2016 Spring;63(1):3-7. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-63.1.3.
3
Pain behaviour and distress in children during two sequential dental visits: comparing a computerised anaesthesia delivery system and a traditional syringe.儿童在连续两次牙科就诊期间的疼痛行为与痛苦:比较计算机化麻醉给药系统和传统注射器。
Br Dent J. 2008 Jul 12;205(1):E2; discussion 30-1. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.414. Epub 2008 May 23.
4
A randomized controlled trial comparing mandibular local anesthesia techniques in children receiving nitrous oxide-oxygen sedation.一项比较接受氧化亚氮-氧气镇静的儿童下颌局部麻醉技术的随机对照试验。
Anesth Prog. 2004;51(1):19-23.
5
Comparison of Anaesthetic Efficacy of 4% Articaine Primary Buccal Infiltration Versus 2% Lidocaine Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Symptomatic Mandibular First Molar Teeth.4%阿替卡因颊侧局部浸润与2%利多卡因下牙槽神经阻滞用于有症状下颌第一磨牙麻醉效果的比较
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2016 Jan;26(1):4-8.
6
The time used to administer local anesthesia to 5 and 6 year olds.
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1996 Summer;20(4):321-3.
7
Comparison of Visual Analog Scale Scores in Pain Assessment during Pulpotomy using Different Injection Materials in Children Aged 6 to 8 and 8 to 10 Years.6至8岁和8至10岁儿童在牙髓切断术中使用不同注射材料进行疼痛评估时视觉模拟量表评分的比较
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Mar 1;19(3):313-317.
8
Effects of Two Different Anesthetic Solutions on Injection Pain, Efficacy, and Duration of Soft-Tissue Anesthesia with Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block for Primary Molars.两种不同麻醉溶液对下颌第一磨牙下牙槽神经阻滞软组织麻醉的注射疼痛、疗效及持续时间的影响
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;40(6):456-463. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-40.6.456.
9
Mandibular block or maxillary infiltration: does it influence children's opposition to a subsequent dental visit?下颌阻滞麻醉或上颌浸润麻醉:会影响儿童对后续牙科就诊的抗拒吗?
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2012 Spring;36(3):245-9.
10
The effect of pre-cooling the injection site on pediatric pain perception during the administration of local anesthesia.局部麻醉给药期间,注射部位预冷对小儿疼痛感知的影响。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2009 May 1;10(3):43-50.

引用本文的文献

1
Infraorbital Swelling Induced by an Inadvertent Local Anesthesia Technique in a Six-Year-Old Female Child: A Clinical Case Report.一名六岁女童因意外局部麻醉技术导致眶下肿胀:临床病例报告
Cureus. 2025 Jun 11;17(6):e85748. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85748. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Comparison of Automatically Controlled Injection System with a Traditional. Syringe for Multiple Infiltrations in Children Aged 6-12 Years: A Randomized Controlled Trial.6至12岁儿童多次浸润麻醉中自动控制注射系统与传统注射器的比较:一项随机对照试验
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Apr;16(Suppl 2):S1535-S1538. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1214_23. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
3
Evaluation of efficacy of computer-controlled local anaesthetic delivery system vs traditional injection system for minor pediatric surgical procedures in children.
计算机控制局部麻醉药输送系统与传统注射系统用于小儿小手术的疗效评估
Med J Armed Forces India. 2022 Sep;78(Suppl 1):S89-S95. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2020.08.010. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
4
Efficacy of Articaine vs Lignocaine for infiltration anaesthesia during primary molar extractions.阿替卡因与利多卡因用于乳牙拔除浸润麻醉的疗效比较。
Pak J Med Sci. 2022 Mar-Apr;38(4Part-II):1048-1055. doi: 10.12669/pjms.38.4.5343.
5
Patient evaluations after local anesthesia with a computer-assisted method and a conventional syringe before and after reflection time: A prospective randomized controlled trial.反射时间前后采用计算机辅助方法和传统注射器进行局部麻醉后的患者评估:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Heliyon. 2021 Feb 8;7(2):e06012. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06012. eCollection 2021 Feb.
6
"Comparative study of conventional anesthesia technique versus computerized system anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial".常规麻醉技术与计算机系统麻醉的比较研究:一项随机临床试验
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Apr;25(4):2307-2315. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03553-5. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
7
Interventions for increasing acceptance of local anaesthetic in children and adolescents having dental treatment.提高接受牙科治疗的儿童和青少年对局部麻醉剂接受度的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 27;2(2):CD011024. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011024.pub2.
8
Procedural pain in routine dental care for children: a part of the Swedish BITA study.儿童常规牙科护理中的程序性疼痛:瑞典BITA研究的一部分
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018 Oct;19(5):365-372. doi: 10.1007/s40368-018-0368-2. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
9
Single tooth anesthesia versus conventional anesthesia: a cross-over study.单牙麻醉与常规麻醉的比较:一项交叉研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Dec;22(9):3205-3213. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2413-2. Epub 2018 Mar 10.
10
Insulin Syringe: A Gimmick in Pediatric Dentistry.胰岛素注射器:儿科牙科中的一个噱头。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2017 Oct-Dec;10(4):319-323. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1458. Epub 2017 Feb 27.