Chirillo F, Bruni A, Giujusa T, Totis O, Cavarzerani A, Stritoni P
Department of Cardiology, Regional Hospital, Treviso, Italy.
Am J Card Imaging. 1995 Jul;9(3):174-9.
The echocardiographic characteristics of vegetation used by precordial echocardiography (PE) have been transferred unchanged to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), which has different image definition and structural resolution. Twelve diagnostic criteria of vegetation were tested for their accuracy in 52 patients evaluated by PE and TEE for suspected endocarditis (36 men, 16 women; mean age, 62 +/- 18 years; 42 with proven endocarditis). Results of PE and TEE were validated against gross anatomic and histologic findings. Significant differences (P < .05) included the fact that TEE disclosed more vegetations not prolapsing in the subvalvular region and in absence of valvular regurgitation. At TEE vegetations presented motion distinct from the endocardial surface, irregular conformation, and uneven margins. Only chaotic motion was significantly associated with vegetations at PE; size < 0.5 cm and increased echogenicity characterized pseudovegetations at PE. Other features such as shaggy echoes or location out of the annular zone (previously indicated as typical of vegetations) were not significantly associated with infective lesions. Discriminant analysis of TEE characteristics of vegetations disclosed that chaotic motion was the variable most significantly (P = .008) associated with vegetation. Coexistence of this sign with size < 0.5 cm and uneven margins was associated with 93.3% sensitivity and 83.7% specificity. In conclusion, the echocardiographic aspect of vegetations is rather different when examined from the precordial and the transesophageal approach. Learning about pitfalls and normal variants should improve TEE specificity in the assessment of infective lesions.
经胸超声心动图(PE)用于诊断赘生物的超声心动图特征被原封不动地应用于经食管超声心动图(TEE),而后者具有不同的图像清晰度和结构分辨率。对12条赘生物诊断标准在52例疑似心内膜炎患者中的准确性进行了检测,这些患者接受了PE和TEE检查(36例男性,16例女性;平均年龄62±18岁;42例确诊为心内膜炎)。PE和TEE的结果与大体解剖和组织学检查结果进行了验证。显著差异(P<0.05)包括:TEE发现更多位于瓣下区域且无瓣膜反流的非脱垂赘生物。在TEE检查中,赘生物表现出与心内膜表面不同的运动、不规则形态和不整齐边缘。在PE检查中,只有杂乱运动与赘生物显著相关;大小<0.5 cm和回声增强是PE检查中假赘生物的特征。其他特征,如粗糙回声或位于瓣环区以外的位置(以前被认为是赘生物的典型特征)与感染性病变无显著相关性。对赘生物的TEE特征进行判别分析发现,杂乱运动是与赘生物最显著相关的变量(P = 0.008)。该征象与大小<0.5 cm和边缘不整齐同时存在时,敏感性为93.3%,特异性为83.7%。总之,从经胸和经食管途径检查时,赘生物的超声心动图表现有很大差异。了解陷阱和正常变异应能提高TEE在评估感染性病变时的特异性。