Ethics committees: impediments to research or guardians of ethical standards?
作者信息
While A E
机构信息
Department of Nursing Studies, King's College, University of London.
出版信息
BMJ. 1995 Sep 9;311(7006):661. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7006.661.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Ethics committees: impediments to research or guardians of ethical standards?伦理委员会：研究的阻碍还是道德标准的守护者？
BMJ. 1995 Sep 9;311(7006):661. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7006.661.
2
Cross district comparison of applications to research ethics committees.向研究伦理委员会提交申请的跨地区比较。
BMJ. 1995 Sep 9;311(7006):660-1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7006.660.
3
Ethics approval for a national postal survey: recent experience.一项全国性邮政调查的伦理批准：近期经验
BMJ. 1995 Sep 9;311(7006):659-60. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7006.659.
4
Fees and research ethics committees.费用与研究伦理委员会。
Bull Med Ethics. 1999 Oct;No. 151:18-20.
5
Ethical ethics committees?: a response.伦理道德委员会？：一则回应。
J Med Ethics. 2000 Aug;26(4):289-90. doi: 10.1136/jme.26.4.289-a.
6
More comment from Westminster.来自威斯敏斯特的更多评论。
New Sci. 1998 Oct 3;160(2154):55.
7
Local research ethics committees.当地研究伦理委员会。
BMJ. 1995 Sep 9;311(7006):639-40. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7006.639.
8
The trouble with ethics committees.伦理委员会的问题。
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1994 Mar-Apr;28(2):102-4.
9
Ethical review of multi-centre research: a survey of local research ethics committees in the south Thames region.多中心研究的伦理审查：对泰晤士河南部地区当地研究伦理委员会的一项调查。
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1998 May-Jun;32(3):238-41.
10
Responses of local research ethics committees to a study with approval from a multicentre research ethics committee.地方研究伦理委员会对一项经多中心研究伦理委员会批准的研究的回应。
BMJ. 2000 Apr 29;320(7243):1182-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7243.1182.
引用本文的文献
1
2
Clinical governance and research ethics as barriers to UK low-risk population-based health research?临床治理与研究伦理会成为英国基于低风险人群的健康研究的障碍吗？
BMC Public Health. 2008 Nov 28;8:396. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-396.
3
Impact of institutional review board practice variation on observational health services research.机构审查委员会实践差异对观察性卫生服务研究的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2006 Feb;41(1):214-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00458.x.
4
Ethics, audit, and research: all shades of grey.伦理、审计与研究：灰色的各种色调。
BMJ. 2005 Feb 26;330(7489):468-71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7489.468.
5
Who decides? A look at ethics committee membership.谁来做决定？审视伦理委员会成员构成。
HEC Forum. 2002 Sep;14(3):252-8. doi: 10.1023/a:1020581131605.
6
New governance arrangements for research ethics committees: is facilitating research achieved at the cost of participants' interest.研究伦理委员会的新治理安排：促进研究是以牺牲参与者的利益为代价实现的吗？
J Med Ethics. 2002 Oct;28(5):318-21. doi: 10.1136/jme.28.5.318.
7
The new system of review by multicentre research ethics committees: prospective study.多中心研究伦理委员会的新审查系统：前瞻性研究。
BMJ. 2000 Apr 29;320(7243):1179-82. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7243.1179.
8
Research ethics committees: a regional approach.研究伦理委员会：一种区域性方法。
Theor Med Bioeth. 1999 Apr;20(2):161-79. doi: 10.1023/a:1009989104496.
9
Responses by four Local Research Ethics Committees to submitted proposals.四个地方研究伦理委员会对提交提案的回复。
J Med Ethics. 1999 Jun;25(3):274-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.25.3.274.
10
Performance of research ethics committees in Spain. A prospective study of 100 applications for clinical trial protocols on medicines.西班牙研究伦理委员会的表现。一项针对100份药物临床试验方案申请的前瞻性研究。
J Med Ethics. 1999 Jun;25(3):268-73. doi: 10.1136/jme.25.3.268.
本文引用的文献
1
The social control of human biomedical research: an overview and review of the literature.人类生物医学研究的社会控制：文献综述与概述
Soc Sci Med. 1989;29(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(89)90122-6.
2
Diversity in the practice of district ethics committees.地区伦理委员会实践中的多样性。
BMJ. 1989 Dec 9;299(6713):1437-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6713.1437.
Zotero 插件