Ambrosino N, Callegari G, Galloni C, Brega S, Pinna G
Clinica del Lavoro Foundation IRCCS, Respiratory Unit, Italy.
Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 1995 Aug;50(4):269-75.
The benefit of chest physiotherapy in patients with cystic fibrosis has been well documented. However, the benefit of similar rehabilitation in patients with large amounts of sputum who have diagnoses other than cystic fibrosis has not been clearly demonstrated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the acute effectiveness of a device advised for home chest physiotherapy in comparison to postural drainage combined with chest percussion in removing secretions in patients with high sputum production due to diseases other than cystic fibrosis. Fourteen in-patients, known to spontaneously produce more than 25 mL sputum.day-1, underwent two sessions each of two treatment modalities in random order. Treatment A consisted of postural drainage and manual chest percussion. Treatment B included breathing through a commercial device claimed to combine oscillating positive expiratory pressure with oscillations of the airflow. Expiratory flows and oxygen saturation were monitored and recorded throughout the study. The amount of sputum produced in the 30 min preceding, during, and in the 60 min after completing each treatment session was recorded, together with the sensation of "chest unpleasantness due to secretions" as assessed by means of a modified visual analogue scale. The mean time that the patients tolerated treatment was not different for A and B (18.7 +/- 5 and 19.3 +/- 5 min, respectively). Sputum significantly increased during both treatment periods and in the same amount for the two modalities (2.9 +/- 2.9 to 10.9 +/- 7.1 and 2.8 +/- 3.1 to 10.1 +/- 10.8 mL for A and B, respectively). Visual analogue scale score significantly decreased at the end of each treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
胸部物理治疗对囊性纤维化患者的益处已有充分记录。然而,对于患有大量痰液但诊断并非囊性纤维化的患者,类似康复治疗的益处尚未得到明确证实。本研究的目的是评估一种建议用于家庭胸部物理治疗的设备与体位引流联合胸部叩击相比,在清除非囊性纤维化疾病导致痰液分泌过多患者的分泌物方面的急性有效性。14名已知每日自发咳痰超过25 mL的住院患者,以随机顺序接受两种治疗方式各两次治疗。治疗A包括体位引流和手动胸部叩击。治疗B包括通过一种声称能将振荡呼气正压与气流振荡相结合的商用设备进行呼吸。在整个研究过程中监测并记录呼气流量和血氧饱和度。记录每次治疗前30分钟、治疗期间以及治疗结束后60分钟内产生的痰液量,以及通过改良视觉模拟量表评估的“因分泌物导致的胸部不适”感觉。患者耐受治疗的平均时间在A组和B组无差异(分别为18.7±5分钟和19.3±5分钟)。两种治疗期间痰液均显著增加,且两种方式增加量相同(A组从2.9±2.9 mL增至10.9±7.1 mL,B组从2.8±3.1 mL增至10.1±10.8 mL)。每次治疗结束时视觉模拟量表评分显著降低。(摘要截选至250字)