Osadnik Christian R, McDonald Christine F, Jones Arthur P, Holland Anne E
School of Physiotherapy, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD008328. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008328.pub2.
Cough and sputum production are common in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and are associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Airway clearance techniques (ACTs) aim to remove sputum from the lungs, however evidence of their efficacy during acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) or stable disease is unclear.
To assess the safety and efficacy of ACTs for individuals with AECOPD and stable COPD.
We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register of trials from inception to October 2011, and PEDro in October 2009.
We included randomised parallel trials and randomised cross-over trials which compared an ACT to no treatment, cough or sham ACT in participants with investigator-defined COPD, emphysema or chronic bronchitis.
Two review authors independently conducted data extraction and assessed the risk of bias. We analysed data from studies of AECOPD separately from stable COPD, and classified the effects of ACTs as 'immediate' (less than 24 hours), 'short-term' (24 hours to eight weeks) or 'long-term' (greater than eight weeks). One subgroup analysis compared the effects of ACTs that use positive expiratory pressure (PEP) to those that do not.
Twenty-eight studies on 907 participants were included in the review. Study sample size was generally small (range 5 to 96 people) and overall quality was generally poor due to inadequate blinding and allocation procedures. Meta-analyses were limited by heterogeneity of outcome measurement and inadequate reporting of data.In people experiencing AECOPD, ACT use was associated with small but significant short-term reductions in the need for increased ventilatory assistance (odds ratio (OR) 0.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05 to 0.85; data from four studies on 171 people), the duration of ventilatory assistance (mean difference (MD) -2.05 days, 95% CI -2.60 to -1.51; mean duration for control groups seven days; data from two studies on 54 people) and hospital length of stay (MD -0.75 days, 95% CI -1.38 to -0.11; mean duration for control groups nine days; one study on 35 people). Data from a limited number of studies revealed no significant long-term benefits of ACTs on the number of exacerbations or hospitalisations, nor any short-term beneficial effect on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as measured by the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score (MD -2.30, 95% CI -11.80 to 7.20; one study on 59 people).In people with stable COPD, data from single studies revealed no significant short-term benefit of ACTs on the number of people with exacerbations (OR 3.21, 95% CI 0.12 to 85.20; one study on 30 people), significant short-term improvements in HRQoL as measured by the SGRQ total score (MD -6.10, 95% CI -8.93 to -3.27; one study on 15 people) and a reduced long-term need for respiratory-related hospitalisation (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.95; one study on 35 participants).The magnitude of effect of PEP-based ACTs on the need for increased ventilatory assistance and hospital length of stay was greater than for non-PEP ACTs, however we found no statistically significant subgroup differences. There was one report of vomiting during treatment with postural drainage and head-down tilt.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from this review indicates that airway clearance techniques are safe for individuals with COPD and confer small beneficial effects on some clinical outcomes. Consideration may be given to the use of airway clearance techniques for patients with COPD in both acute and stable disease, however current studies suggest that the benefits achieved may be small.
咳嗽和咳痰在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)中很常见,且与不良临床结局相关。气道廓清技术(ACTs)旨在清除肺内痰液,然而其在慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期(AECOPD)或稳定期疾病中的疗效证据尚不清楚。
评估ACTs对AECOPD和稳定期COPD患者的安全性和疗效。
我们检索了Cochrane气道组专业试验注册库,时间从建库至2011年10月,以及2009年10月的PEDro数据库。
我们纳入了随机平行试验和随机交叉试验,这些试验在研究者定义的COPD、肺气肿或慢性支气管炎参与者中,将一种ACT与不治疗、咳嗽或假ACT进行比较。
两位综述作者独立进行数据提取并评估偏倚风险。我们分别分析了AECOPD研究和稳定期COPD研究的数据,并将ACTs的效果分类为“即时”(少于24小时)、“短期”(24小时至8周)或“长期”(大于8周)。一项亚组分析比较了使用呼气末正压(PEP)的ACTs与未使用PEP的ACTs的效果。
本综述纳入了28项针对907名参与者的研究。研究样本量通常较小(范围为5至96人),且由于盲法和分配程序不充分,总体质量普遍较差。荟萃分析受到结局测量异质性和数据报告不充分的限制。
在AECOPD患者中,使用ACTs与短期少量但显著减少增加通气辅助的需求相关(比值比(OR)0.21,95%置信区间(CI)0.05至0.85;来自4项研究171人的数据)、通气辅助持续时间(平均差(MD)-2.05天,95%CI -2.60至-1.51;对照组平均持续时间为7天;来自2项研究54人的数据)以及住院时间(MD -0.75天,95%CI -1.38至-0.11;对照组平均持续时间为9天;1项研究35人)。来自有限数量研究的数据显示,ACTs对加重次数或住院次数没有显著的长期益处,也未显示出对圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)总分所测量的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)有任何短期有益影响(MD -2.30,95%CI -11.80至7.20;1项研究59人)。
在稳定期COPD患者中,单项研究的数据显示,ACTs对加重患者数量没有显著短期益处(OR 3.21,95%CI 0.12至85.20;1项研究30人),对SGRQ总分所测量的HRQoL有显著短期改善(MD -6.10,95%CI -8.93至-3.27;1项研究15人),以及长期减少呼吸相关住院需求(OR 0.27,95%CI 0.08至0.95;1项研究35名参与者)。基于PEP的ACTs对增加通气辅助需求和住院时间的影响程度大于非PEP的ACTs,然而我们未发现具有统计学意义的亚组差异。有一份关于体位引流和头低位治疗期间呕吐的报告。
本综述的证据表明,气道廓清技术对COPD患者是安全的,并对某些临床结局有小的有益影响。对于急性和稳定期COPD患者,可考虑使用气道廓清技术,然而目前的研究表明所取得的益处可能较小。