• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

徒劳还剩下什么?无脑儿与《紧急医疗救治与分娩法案》的交汇。

What is left of futility? The convergence of anencephaly and the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act.

作者信息

Diekema D S

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, USA.

出版信息

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995 Oct;149(10):1156-9. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1995.02170230110017.

DOI:10.1001/archpedi.1995.02170230110017
PMID:7550822
Abstract

In 1986, Congress passed legislation intended to prevent hospitals from "dumping" patients who were unable to pay for their care. This legislation was appended to the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act as the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA). The EMTALA imposes two sets of duties on all hospitals that receive Medicare funds. Since 98% of hospitals in the United States participate in the Medicare program, EMTALA applies to nearly all hospitals in the United States. In short, hospitals with an emergency department must provide an appropriate screening examination to any patient who requests treatment. The purpose of the medical screening examination is to determine whether an "emergency medical condition" exists. If an emergency medical condition is discovered, the hospital must either provide treatment sufficient to stabilize the patient's condition or transfer the patient to another medical facility in an acceptable fashion.

摘要

1986年,国会通过立法,旨在防止医院“抛弃”无力支付医疗费用的患者。该立法作为《紧急医疗救治与积极分娩法案》(EMTALA)被附加到《综合预算协调法案》中。EMTALA对所有接受医疗保险资金的医院规定了两套职责。由于美国98%的医院参与了医疗保险计划,EMTALA适用于美国几乎所有的医院。简而言之,设有急诊科的医院必须对任何请求治疗的患者进行适当的筛查检查。医疗筛查检查的目的是确定是否存在“紧急医疗状况”。如果发现紧急医疗状况,医院必须提供足以稳定患者病情的治疗,或以可接受的方式将患者转至另一家医疗机构。

相似文献

1
What is left of futility? The convergence of anencephaly and the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act.徒劳还剩下什么?无脑儿与《紧急医疗救治与分娩法案》的交汇。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995 Oct;149(10):1156-9. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1995.02170230110017.
2
In re Baby K.
Fed Report. 1994 Feb 10;16:590-9.
3
In re Baby K.关于婴儿K的案件
Fed Suppl. 1993 Jul 1;832:1022-31.
4
Call 911: psychiatry and the new Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) regulations.拨打911:精神病学与新的《紧急医疗救治与分娩法案》(EMTALA)规定。
J Psychiatry Law. 2004 Winter;32(4):483-512. doi: 10.1177/009318530403200403.
5
Baby K: protected at law.婴儿K:受法律保护。
Trends Health Care Law Ethics. 1994 Winter;9(1):7-12.
6
One advocate's viewpoint: conflicts and tensions in the Baby K case.
J Law Med Ethics. 1995 Spring;23(1):7-12; discussion 13-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1995.tb01323.x.
7
Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.“婴儿多伊”事件重演?美国卫生与公众服务部及2002年《出生时存活婴儿保护法》:关于规范新生儿医疗行为的警示
Pediatrics. 2005 Oct;116(4):e576-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1590.
8
When a patient demands what health care providers deem foolish: medical-ethical analysis of the case of Baby K.当患者提出医疗服务提供者认为愚蠢的要求时:对“宝贝 K”案的医学伦理分析
Clin Ethics Rep. 1993;7(4):1-12.
9
Medical futility and implications for physician autonomy.医疗无效性及其对医生自主权的影响。
Am J Law Med. 1995;21(2-3):221-40.
10
The Baby K case: a search for the elusive standard of medical care.“宝贝 K 案”:探寻难以捉摸的医疗护理标准
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1997 Winter;6(1):9-18. doi: 10.1017/s0963180100007556.