Bernardi M, Solomonow M, Sanchez J H, Baratta R V, Nguyen G
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans 70112, USA.
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1995;70(6):493-501. doi: 10.1007/BF00634378.
The purpose of this study was to determine if differences exist between the control strategies of two antagonist thigh muscles during knee flexion and extension muscular coactivation. Surface myoelectric signal (MES) of the quadriceps (rectus femoris) and the hamstrings (semitendinosus) were obtained from both muscles while performing step-wise increasing contractions during flexion and extension with the knee at 1.57 rad of flexion (90 degrees). The median frequency of the power density spectrum, which is related to the average muscle fiber action potential conduction velocity and therefore to motor unit recruitment, was calculated from each MES. The results suggest that, in all the subjects tested, when the muscle acts as antagonist most motor units are recruited up to 50% of the maximal voluntary force, whereas when the muscle acts as antagonist motor units are recruited up to 40% of the maximal voluntary force. The force range past 40-50% of the maximal force is also characterized by differences between the agonist/antagonist.
