Casey L, Gillanders W R, Oprandi A M, Gilchrist V J, Iverson D
Aultman Hospital, Canton, Ohio, USA.
Fam Med. 1995 Jul-Aug;27(7):424-30.
The financial impact of a family practice residency program on a sponsoring institution is poorly understood. This study intended to describe as fully as possible all the expenses and revenues from five community-based family practice residency programs in northeastern Ohio.
Direct and indirect expenses, revenues, and demographics were evaluated for 1992. Similarities and differences among the participating programs were examined.
Overall expenses per resident were similar in all five programs, with a range from $162,000 to $203,000. Revenues reflected the number of residents in the program, although collection ratios varied. Inpatient collections ranged from 53%-76% and outpatient collections ranged from 60%-76%. An average of 30% of graduates from the past 10 years were on the active medical staff of their sponsoring institution, with a range of 21%-36%.
Based on the expenses, revenues collected, and reasonable assumptions made about cost of care in the hospital setting, the family practice residencies are probably a break-even operation, excluding the benefit of providing primary care physicians to the community.
家庭医学住院医师培训项目对主办机构的财务影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在尽可能全面地描述俄亥俄州东北部五个社区家庭医学住院医师培训项目的所有费用和收入。
对1992年的直接和间接费用、收入及人口统计学数据进行评估。研究了参与项目之间的异同。
所有五个项目中每位住院医师的总体费用相似,范围在16.2万美元至20.3万美元之间。收入反映了项目中的住院医师人数,尽管收款比例有所不同。住院收入范围为53% - 76%,门诊收入范围为60% - 76%。过去10年毕业生中平均有30%在其主办机构的在职医务人员名单上,范围在21% - 36%之间。
根据费用、收取的收入以及对医院环境中护理成本的合理假设,家庭医学住院医师培训项目可能收支平衡,不包括为社区提供初级保健医生的益处。