Tormo Díaz M J, Moreno-Sueskun I, Chirlaque López M D, Navarro Sánchez C
Servicio de Epidemiología, Consejería de Sanidad y Asuntos Sociales, Murcia.
Gac Sanit. 1995 May-Jun;9(48):174-82.
This study aims to validate a frequency questionnaire for categorically ranking people according to recent physical activity (PA) (previous two weeks), applicable to both sexes. Seven one-day PA records were collected for 30 males and 32 females during two weeks. After, the frequency questionnaire was administered covering the same period. The differences (paired-test) between the means obtained by both methods were globally significant for females and for some subgroups of activities in both sexes. The Pearson's correlation coefficient between both methods was 0.78 for males and 0.65 for females. The degree of agreement among methods classifying the subjects on terciles of total PA was lower in males (weighted kappa kw = 0.35, p < 0.06) than in females (KW = 0.52, p < 0.004). Although the study size prevents to infer definitive conclusions, the questionnaire performs better when measuring basic, occupational and total PA than leisure time PA. Its use as a way of ranking individuals in three categories (terciles) of total PA will produce an approximated degree of misclassification of 30% in the lowest tercile of males meanwhile this degree will not go far beyond than 10% for other categories in both sexes.
本研究旨在验证一份频率问卷,该问卷可根据近期身体活动(PA)(前两周)对人群进行分类排名,适用于男女两性。在两周内收集了30名男性和32名女性的7份单日PA记录。之后,发放了涵盖同一时期的频率问卷。两种方法所得均值之间的差异(配对检验)在女性以及男女两性的一些活动亚组中总体上具有显著性。两种方法之间的皮尔逊相关系数男性为0.78,女性为0.65。在将受试者按总PA三分位数分类的方法之间,男性的一致性程度(加权kappa系数kw = 0.35,p < 0.06)低于女性(KW = 0.52,p < 0.004)。尽管研究规模限制了得出确定性结论,但该问卷在测量基本、职业和总PA时比测量休闲时间PA表现更好。将其用作按总PA的三个类别(三分位数)对个体进行排名的方式,在男性最低三分位数中会产生约30%的错误分类程度,而在男女两性的其他类别中,这一程度不会超过10%。