• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

部分精神错乱:当司法系统与精神病学界发生冲突时。

Partial insanity: when the judiciary and the psychiatric world collide.

作者信息

Altmark D, Sigal M, Gelkopf M

机构信息

Lev Hasharon Mental Health Center, Netanya, Israel.

出版信息

Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 1995;32(2):109-13.

PMID:7558755
Abstract

The psychiatric and judicial concepts of mental disorders are similar but not always identical. The gap between them creates confusion, a lack of unity and inconsistencies in decision making. This gap needs to be bridged. In the hinterland of these concepts lies a range of psychiatric disturbances such as encapsulated over organized delusional disorders (Paranoia Vera) and life endangering eating disorders (Anorexia Nervosa). When life threatening or criminal responsibility circumstances arise, the dilemma presented to the psychiatrists on the one hand and the judicial system on the other reaches its peak. Presented in the article are aspects of the gray areas of involuntary commitment and criminal responsibility.

摘要

精神障碍的精神病学概念和司法概念相似但并非总是相同。它们之间的差距造成了混乱、缺乏统一性以及决策上的不一致。这种差距需要弥合。在这些概念的背后存在一系列精神障碍,比如局限性的系统性妄想障碍(真性偏执狂)和危及生命的进食障碍(神经性厌食症)。当出现危及生命或刑事责任的情况时,摆在精神科医生和司法系统面前的两难困境达到了顶峰。本文介绍了非自愿住院和刑事责任等灰色地带的相关方面。

相似文献

1
Partial insanity: when the judiciary and the psychiatric world collide.部分精神错乱:当司法系统与精神病学界发生冲突时。
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 1995;32(2):109-13.
2
[Compliance with psychiatric legal ordinance section 63 STGB. Legal principles--current status--treatment concepts--perspectives].[遵守《德国刑法典》第63条的精神科法律条例。法律原则——现状——治疗理念——展望]
Nervenarzt. 1995 Nov;66(11):793-801.
3
[Is there a reason to criminalize psychiatric patients to create treatment facilities for them?].[是否有理由将精神病患者定罪以给他们创建治疗设施?]
Psychiatr Prax. 2003 Apr;30(3):105-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-38610.
4
The impossible dialogue between psychiatry and the judicial system: a language problem.
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 2006;43(3):150-4; discussion 155-8.
5
In defense of the insanity defense.
Hillside J Clin Psychiatry. 1983;5(1):73-90.
6
[The reliability of expert assessment: comparative study of hospitalized or imprisoned patients following criminal behavior].[专家评估的可靠性:对犯罪行为后住院或被监禁患者的比较研究]
Ann Med Psychol (Paris). 1992 Dec;150(10):741-5; discussion 745-6.
7
Mentally abnormal killers in the UK health care system: issues facing the multidisciplinary team.
J Forensic Sci. 1995 Jan;40(1):69-73.
8
The case that has psychiatrists running scared: Ahmed v. Stefaniu.令精神科医生们胆战心惊的案例:艾哈迈德诉斯特凡纽案。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2009;37(2):250-6.
9
Mentally disordered offenders in Sweden.瑞典的精神错乱罪犯。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1991;19(4):389-93.
10
Factors associated with the diversion of mentally disordered offenders.与精神错乱罪犯转处相关的因素。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1994;22(3):389-97.