Irvine D R, Park V N, Mattingley J B
Department of Psychology, Monash University, Clayton, Vic, Australia.
Hear Res. 1995 May;85(1-2):127-41. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(95)00040-b.
Although the sensitivity to interaural intensity differences (IIDs) of neurons receiving excitatory - inhibitory binaural input (EI neurons) has been examined in numerous studies, the mechanisms underlying this sensitivity remain unclear. According to the 'latency hypotheses' neuronal sensitivity to IIDs reflects sensitivity to differences in the timing of ipsilateral and contralateral inputs that are produced as a consequence of the effects of intensity upon latency. If the latency hypothesis is correct, a neuron's responses over any given IID range should be predicted by its responses to the interaural time differences (ITDs) that are 'equivalent' to the IIDs tested, in the sense that they produce the same changes in the relative timing of inputs. This prediction from the latency hypotheses were examined by determining the sensitivity of EI neurons in the inferior colliculus of anesthetized rats to IIDs and ITDs in click stimuli, under conditions that allowed 'equivalent' ITDs to be estimated. In approximately 10% of the 41 neurons tested, the IID-sensitivity function was a perfect or near-perfect match to the equivalent-ITD function, indicating that IID sensitivity could be entirely accounted for in terms of sensitivity to intensity-produced neural time differences, as asserted by the latency hypothesis. For the majority of neurons, however, sensitivity to equivalent ITDs accounted only partially for the characteristics of the IID-sensitivity function; other features of the function in these cases appeared to reflect the operation of an additional factor, most probably the relative magnitude of the inputs from the two ears. Although the conclusions are qualified by the fact that one of the assumptions on which the estimation of equivalent ITDs was based was probably not satisfied for some neurons, the results suggest that intensity-produced changes in both the magnitude and the timing of excitatory and inhibitory inputs shape the IID sensitivity of most EI neurons.
尽管在众多研究中已经考察了接受兴奋性 - 抑制性双耳输入的神经元(EI神经元)对双耳强度差(IID)的敏感性,但其敏感性背后的机制仍不清楚。根据“潜伏期假说”,神经元对IID的敏感性反映了对同侧和对侧输入时间差异的敏感性,这种差异是由强度对潜伏期的影响所导致的。如果潜伏期假说是正确的,那么在任何给定的IID范围内,神经元的反应应该可以通过其对与所测试的IID“等效”的双耳时间差(ITD)的反应来预测,即它们会在输入的相对时间上产生相同的变化。通过在允许估计“等效”ITD的条件下,测定麻醉大鼠下丘中EI神经元对点击刺激中的IID和ITD的敏感性,对潜伏期假说的这一预测进行了检验。在所测试的41个神经元中,约10%的神经元的IID敏感性函数与等效ITD函数完全或近乎完全匹配,这表明IID敏感性可以完全根据对强度产生的神经时间差异的敏感性来解释,正如潜伏期假说所主张的那样。然而,对于大多数神经元来说,对等效ITD的敏感性仅部分解释了IID敏感性函数的特征;在这些情况下,该函数的其他特征似乎反映了另一个因素的作用,很可能是来自双耳输入的相对大小。尽管由于等效ITD估计所基于的一个假设可能对某些神经元不成立这一事实,使得结论具有一定局限性,但结果表明,兴奋性和抑制性输入的大小和时间上由强度产生的变化塑造了大多数EI神经元的IID敏感性。